Public service broadcasting

被引:33
作者
Armstrong, M [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00013.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This essay discusses the merits of public intervention in the provision of television broadcasting services. I argue that intervention was justified in the past, when there were just a few channels and when advertising was the sole source of commercial funds. However, the advent of subscription television overcomes many of the market failures that once existed. Moreover, asymmetric treatment of broadcasters acts to distort the incentives of commercial broadcasters. Finally, viewers have an increasing ability to avoid unappealing, but perhaps socially desirable, content, which further weakens the case for public intervention in the market.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 299
页数:19
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ANDERSON S, 2005, IN PRESS REV EC STUD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TELEVISION QUALITY L, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203812266
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CAN MARKET DELIVER F
[4]  
ARMSTRONG M, 2004, EC REGULATION BROADC
[5]  
COASE RH, 1966, AM ECON REV, V56, P440
[6]  
Coase Ronald Harry., 1950, British Broadcasting: A Study in Monopoly
[7]  
CRAMPES C, 2005, UNPUB COMPETING ADVE
[8]  
Davies G., 1999, FUTURE FUNDING BBC
[9]  
Dollar Caroline, 2005, CAN MARKET DELIVER F
[10]  
GRAHAM A, 2005, CAN MARKET DELIVER F