Meaning of reliability in terms of correct and incorrect clinical decisions: The art of decision making is still alive

被引：54

作者：

Charter, RA

Feldt, LS

机构：

[1] VA Long Beach Healthcare Syst Med Ctr, Long Beach, CA USA

[2] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY | 2001年 / 23卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1076/jcen.23.4.530.1227

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

Examples using cut-off scores are presented to show the effects of measurement error (unreliability) on making correct and incorrect clinical decisions. These decisions are presented in terms of true positives (TPs), true negatives (TNs), false positives (FPs), and false negatives (FNs). A discussion of the difficulty in establishing reliability standards is presented.

引用

页码：530 / 537

页数：8

共 11 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1984, Assessing individuals: Psychological and educational tests and measurements

[2]

Cicchetti D. V., 1994, Psychol Assess, V6, P284, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284, 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]

[3]

GREGORY RJ, 1999, FDN INTELLECTUAL ASS

[4]

Guilford J.P., 1978, FUNDAMENTAL STAT PSY, V6th

[5]

Guilford J.P., 1950, Fundamental statistics in psychology and education

[6]

Hopkins K.D., 1990, ED PSYCHOL MEASUREME

[7]

Kelly T.L., 1927, Interpretation of educational measurements

[8]

Lord F. M., 1968, Statistical theories of mental test scores

[9]

Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory, V2

[10]

Rosenthal R., 2008, Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis, V3rd ed.

← 1 2 →