Nitrate leaching and nitrogen budget as affected by maize nitrogen rate and soil type

被引:135
作者
Sogbedji, JM
van Es, HM [1 ]
Yang, CL
Geohring, LD
Magdoff, FR
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900060011x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Leaching loss as nitrate (NO3) is a growing concern because of its potential effect on water resources. Leaching of NO3 ffith drainage water from subsurface-drained field plots seeded to maize (Zea mays L.) in 1992, 1993, and 1994 was measured on two soil types (a clay loam and a loamy sand) and for three N fertilization rates (22, 100, and 134 kg N ha(-1)). The 100 kg ha(-1) rate was based on the results of a presidedress nitrate test (PSNT). Nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) teaching was similar between fertilizer N treatments at both sites in 1992, the first year after sod plowdown, but concentrations were greater than 10 mg L-1. For the subsequent two Sears, losses were similar for the 22 kg N ha(-1) and the PSNT-based treatments, but significantly higher for the 133 kg N ha(-1) treatment on the clay loam. On the loamy sand, losses increased from the lowest to the highest N rate. Nitrate leaching losses were consistently higher on the loamy sand than on the clay loam, The N budget results showed that the 133 kg N ha(-1) rate had the highest residual soil NO3-N in the three gears at both sites. On the clay loom, significant N losses occurred from denitrification following alfalfa plowdown and the subsequent fall and spring. Results indicate that N use efficiency rapidly decreases with overfertilization, even with N fertilization rates that only slightly exceed (134%) crop requirements. The PSNT-based rate reduced N leaching losses while maintaining maize yields.
引用
收藏
页码:1813 / 1820
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Addiscott T. M., 1991, FARMING FERTILIZER N
[2]  
AISENBREY R, 1974, DESIGN SMALL CANAL S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, AGRONOMY MONOGRAPH
[4]   NITRATE-NITROGEN IN TILE DRAINAGE AS AFFECTED BY FERTILIZATION [J].
BAKER, JL ;
JOHNSON, HP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1981, 10 (04) :519-522
[5]   Denitrification and nitrous oxide production in soil fallowed or under alfalfa or grass [J].
Beauchamp, EG ;
Bergstrom, DW ;
Burton, DL .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1996, 27 (1-2) :87-99
[6]   NITRATE LEACHING IN A UDIC HAPLOBOROLL AS INFLUENCED BY FERTILIZATION AND LEGUMES [J].
CAMPBELL, CA ;
LAFOND, GP ;
ZENTNER, RP ;
JAME, YW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1994, 23 (01) :195-201
[7]  
Es H. M. van, 1991, Preferential flow: proceedings of the National Symposium, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 16-17 December 1991., P59
[8]  
FRANCIS DD, 1992, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V47, P444
[9]   SIMPLIFIED LONG-TERM CONCEPT FOR EVALUATING LEACHING OF NITROGEN FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND [J].
FRIED, M ;
TANJI, KK ;
VANDEPOL, RM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1976, 5 (02) :197-200
[10]  
GBUREK WJ, 1986, P C AGR IMP GROUNDW, P350