Nitrogen balance for the central Arizona-Phoenix (CAP) ecosystem

被引:192
作者
Baker, LA
Hope, D
Xu, Y
Edmonds, J
Lauver, L
机构
[1] Baker Environm Consulting, Mounds View, MN 55112 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Environm Studies, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Dept Biol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
nitrogen cycling; nitrogen budget; denitrification; groundwater; wastewater; fertilizer; dairy manure; vadose zone; nitrate; urban ecosystem;
D O I
10.1007/s10021-001-0031-2
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A detailed fixed nitrogen (N) mass balance was constructed for the Central Arizona-Phoenix (CAP) ecosystem. Input of fixed N input to the ecosystem was 98 Gg y(-1). Of this, humans deliberately imported or mediated the fixation of 51 Gg N y(-1); combustion processes added another 36 Gg y(-1). Fixation by desert plants, wet deposition, and surface water input accounted for 11 % of total N input. Total fixed N output was 78 Gg N y(-1), a large component of which was gaseous N products of combustion and denitrification. Computed accumulation of N was 21 Gg y(-1) (total input minus total output) or alternatively, 17 Gg y(-1) (summing individual accumulation fluxes). Key uncertainties include dry deposition of atmospheric N and changes in soil storage. inputs to the urban and agricultural components of the ecosystem were an order of magnitude higher than inputs to the desert. Human hydrologic modifications in this ecosystem promote the accumulation and volatilization of N while keeping riverine export low (3% of input). Interplay among the form and amount of N inputs, edaphic and climatic characteristics of the system, hydrologic modifications, and deliberate efforts to reduce N pollution controls the fate of N in human-dominated ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 602
页数:21
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
*ADWR, 1998, 3 MAN PLAN 2000 2010
[2]  
*AKC, 2000, TOP 50 BREEDS DOGS
[3]   Water quality in a sand plain after conversion from dryland to irrigation: tillage and cropping systems compared [J].
Albus, WL ;
Knighton, RE .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1998, 48 (03) :195-206
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, NUTR REQ DAIR CATTL, V6th
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GOOD PRACTICE GUIDAN
[6]  
*AR AGR STAT SERV, 1997, B AR AGR STAT SERV
[7]  
Baker LA, 1992, ECOL ENG, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0925-8574(92)90023-U, 10.1016/0925-8574(92)90023-U]
[8]  
BAKER LA, 1991, ACIDIC DEPOSITION AQ
[9]   ESTIMATION OF NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER USING A WHOLE FARM NITROGEN BUDGET [J].
BARRY, DAJ ;
GOORAHOO, D ;
GOSS, MJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1993, 22 (04) :767-775
[10]  
Bleken MA, 1997, AMBIO, V26, P134