Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates

被引:50
作者
Keating, Nancy L. [1 ,2 ]
Zaslavsky, Alan M. [1 ]
Goldstein, Judy [3 ]
West, Dee W. [3 ]
Ayanian, John Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] No Calif Canc Ctr, Fremont, CA USA
关键词
physicians; surveys; incentives;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eb1d
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent experiences of survey researchers suggest that physicians are becoming less willing to complete surveys. Objective: To compare response rates to a mailed physician survey with a prepaid check incentive of $20 versus $50. Research Design: Randomized controlled trial. Subjects: Five hundred seventy-eight physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer in northern California. Measures: Proportion of physicians responding to the survey. Results: Overall, 60.0% of physicians responded to the survey. The response rate was 52.1% for physicians who received a $20 check versus 67.8% for physicians who received a $50 check (P < 0.001). Similar differences in response rates were seen in strata by physician sex, year graduated from medical school, and survey version (all P < 0.001). More than 42% of physicians who received a $50 check responded to the first mailing, compared with only 30.8% of those who received a $20 check (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Among physicians caring for patients with lung cancer or colorectal cancer in nor-them California, a $50 check incentive was much more effective than a $20 check incentive at increasing response rates to a mailed survey. As physicians become increasingly burdened with surveys, larger incentives may be necessary to engage potential respondents and thus maximize response rates.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 881
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget - A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives [J].
Asch, DA ;
Christakis, NA ;
Ubel, PA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :95-99
[2]
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[3]
Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: The Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium [J].
Ayanian, JZ ;
Chrischilles, EA ;
Wallace, RB ;
Fletcher, RH ;
Fouad, MN ;
Kiefe, CI ;
Harrington, DP ;
Weeks, JC ;
Kahn, KL ;
Malin, JL ;
Lipscomb, J ;
Potosky, AL ;
Provenzale, DT ;
Sandler, RS ;
van Ryn, M ;
West, DW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (15) :2992-2996
[4]
Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians [J].
Beebe, Timothy J. ;
Locke, G. Richard, III ;
Barnes, Sunni A. ;
Davern, Michael E. ;
Anderson, Kari J. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 42 (03) :1219-1234
[5]
BERK ML, 1990, ASA P SECT SURV RES, P766
[6]
PHYSICIAN RESPONSE TO A MAILED SURVEY - AN EXPERIMENT IN TIMING OF PAYMENT [J].
BERRY, SH ;
KANOUSE, DE .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1987, 51 (01) :102-114
[8]
Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians [J].
Cull, WL ;
O'Connor, KG ;
Sharp, S ;
Tang, SFS .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (01) :213-226
[9]
Cummings SM, 2001, HEALTH SERV RES, V35, P1347
[10]
Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive [J].
Delnevo, CD ;
Abatemarco, DJ ;
Steinberg, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 26 (03) :234-236