Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer

被引:120
作者
Marrelli, D
Pinto, E
De Stefano, A
Farnetani, M
Garosi, L
Roviello, F
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Ist Sci Chirurg, UO Chirurg Oncol, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Nuovo Policlin Le Scotte, Lab ASL 7, Siena, Italy
关键词
gastric cancer; CEA; CA; 19-9; 72-4; recurrence; follow-up;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00549-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the serum tumor markers CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the early diagnosis of recurrence of gastric cancer. Methods: One hundred and thirty-three patients who had undergone potentially curative surgery were considered. Serum samples were obtained preoperatively, 1 week after surgery, and at every follow-up examination. Mean follow-up time for the entire patient population was 41 +/- 33 months, and 71 +/- 27 months for patients classified as disease-free. Results: Preoperative positivity was 16% for CEA, 35% for CA 19-9, and 20% for CA 72-4. Recurrence of disease was found in 75 patients (56%). Marker sensitivity in recurrent cases was 44% for CEA, 56% for CA 19-9, and 51% for CA 72-4, the combined use of the three markers increased sensitivity to 87%, which reached 100% in patients with positive preoperative levels. Marker specificity, evaluated in 58 disease-free patients, was 79% for CEA, 74% for CA 19-9, and 97% for CA 72-4. Conclusions: The combined assay of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 may be useful for early diagnosis of recurrence of gastric cancer; however, only CA 72-4 positivity should be considered a specific predictor of tumor recurrence. (C) 2001 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 19
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Fujimoto S, 1997, CANCER, V79, P884, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970301)79:5<884::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-C
[3]  
GUADAGNI F, 1992, CANCER RES, V52, P1222
[4]   COMPARISON OF CA-72-4 WITH CA-19-9 AND CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN IN THE SERODIAGNOSTICS OF GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES [J].
HEPTNER, G ;
DOMSCHKE, S ;
DOMSCHKE, W .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1989, 24 (06) :745-750
[5]   COMPARISON OF SERUM CA-72-4 AND CA-19-9 LEVELS IN GASTRIC-CANCER PATIENTS AND CORRELATION WITH RECURRENCE [J].
JOYPAUL, B ;
BROWNING, M ;
NEWMAN, E ;
BYRNE, D ;
CUSCHIERI, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 169 (06) :595-599
[6]  
KODAMA I, 1995, INT SURG, V80, P45
[7]   COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF CANCER-ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN CA-195, CA19-9 AND CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN IN DIAGNOSIS, FOLLOW-UP AND MONITORING OF RESPONSE TO CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER [J].
KORNEK, G ;
DEPISCH, D ;
TEMSCH, EM ;
SCHEITHAUER, W .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 117 (05) :493-496
[8]   Phase II study of combined administration of 5-flourouracil, epirubicin and mitomycin-C by hepatic artery infusion in patients with liver metastases of gastric cancer [J].
Kumada, T ;
Arai, Y ;
Itoh, K ;
Takayasu, Y ;
Nakamura, K ;
Ariyoshi, Y ;
Tajima, K .
ONCOLOGY, 1999, 57 (03) :216-223
[9]   Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma [J].
Marrelli, D ;
Roviello, F ;
De Stefano, A ;
Farnetani, M ;
Garosi, L ;
Messano, A ;
Pinto, E .
ONCOLOGY, 1999, 57 (01) :55-62
[10]  
Shimada K, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V86, P1657, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1657::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO