What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?

被引:414
作者
Cepeda, MS
Africano, JM
Polo, R
Alcala, R
Carr, DB
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Javeriana Univ, San Ignacio Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
pain assessment; gender differences; age differences; patient oriented research;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00176-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Despite widespread use of the 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain intensity, relatively little is known about the meaning of decreases in pain intensity assessed by means of this scale to patients. We aimed to establish the meaning to patients of declines in pain intensity and percent pain reduction. Upon arrival to the postanesthesia care unit, postsurgical patients rated their baseline pain intensity on both a 0-10 NRS and on a 4-point verbal scale. Patients whose NRS was higher than 4/10 received intravenous opioids until their pain intensity declined to 4/10 or lower. During opioid titration, patients were asked every 10 min to rate pain intensity on a NRS and to indicate the degree of pain improvement on a 5-point Likert scale from 'no improvement' to complete pain relief'. Seven hundred adult patients were enrolled. For patients with moderate pain, a decrease of 1.3 units (20% reduction) corresponded to 'minimal' improvement, a decrease of 2.4 (35% reduction) to 'much' improvement, a decrease of 3.5 units (45% reduction) corresponded to 'very much' improvement. For patients with severe pain, the decrease in NRS pain score and the percentage of pain relief had to be larger to obtain similar degrees of pain relief'. The change in pain intensity that is meaningful to patients increases as the severity of their baseline pain increases. The present findings are applicable in the clinical setting and research arena to assess treatment efficacy. (C) 2003 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 157
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Acute pain management: Operative or medical procedures and trauma clinical practice guideline
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ADV PAIN RES THER
[3]   The visual analog scale for pain - Clinical significance in postoperative patients [J].
Bodian, CA ;
Freedman, G ;
Hossain, S ;
Eisenkraft, JB ;
Beilin, Y .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (06) :1356-1361
[4]   Acute pain [J].
Carr, DB ;
Goudas, LC .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9169) :2051-2058
[5]  
CARR DB, 2002, AHRQ PUBLICATION, V61
[6]   The combination of low dose of naloxone and morphine in PCA does not decrease opioid requirements in the postoperative period [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Africano, JM ;
Manrique, AM ;
Fragoso, W ;
Carr, DB .
PAIN, 2002, 96 (1-2) :73-79
[7]  
CEPEDA MS, 2003, IN PRESS ANESTH ANAL
[8]   The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? [J].
Collins, SL ;
Moore, RA ;
McQuay, HJ .
PAIN, 1997, 72 (1-2) :95-97
[9]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[10]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294