The effect of ankle ligament damage and surgical reconstructions on the mechanics of the ankle and subtalar joints revealed by three-dimensional stress MRI

Common image-based diagnostic techniques used to detect ankle ligament injuries or the effects of those injuries (e.g., mechanical instability) include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and stress radiography. Each of these techniques has limitations. The interpretation of the results obtained through stress radiography, a two-dimensional technique, is highly controversial. MRI can facilitate visualization of soft tissue, but three-dimensional visualization of the full length of the ligaments or detecting partial ligament damage is difficult. This work is part of along-term study aimed at improving the diagnostic ability of MRI by utilizing it not only to visualize the ligaments but also to detect the mechanical instability produced at the ankle and subtalar joints due to ligament damage. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the ability of a previously developed technique called 3D stress MRI (sMRI) to detect in vitro the effect of damage to the lateral collateral ligaments and the stabilizing effect produced by two common surgical reconstruction techniques. MRI data were collected from eight cadaver limbs in a MR compatible ankle-loading device in neutral, inversion, and anterior drawer. Each specimen was tested intact, after cutting the anterior talo-fibular ligament followed by the calcaneo-fibular ligament and after applying two reconstructions. Ligament injuries produced significant changes in the response of the ankle and subtalar joints to load as detected by the 3D stress MRI technique. Both surgical procedures restored mechanical stability to the joints but they differed in the amount and type of stabilization achieved. We concluded that 3D sMRI can extend the diagnostic power of MRI from the current practice of slice-by-slice visualization to the assessment of mechanical function, the compromise in this function due to injury, and the effects of surgery. (c) 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.