Morphology of Australopithecus anamensis from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya

被引:192
作者
Ward, CV
Leakey, MG
Walker, A
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Anthropol, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Pathol & Anat Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Natl Museums Kenya, Div Palaeontol, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Anthropol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Biol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Australopithecus anamensis; Kanapoi; Allia Bay; description; morphology;
D O I
10.1006/jhev.2001.0507
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The hominid species Australopithecus anamensis was originally described in 1995, with new specimens and more secure dates given in 1998. This paper lists all fossils attributed to A. anamensis, and provides anatomical descriptions of those not yet described in detail with photographs of all but undiagnostic fragments. We also provide comparative analysis of these specimens. The A. anamensis holotype mandible was found at Kanapoi, as were most of the paratypes. The Allia Bay sample is less well represented, and does not preserve many anatomical elements diagnostic of this species. Still, the Allia Bay sample most closely resembles that from Kanapoi, and we suggest that for the time being it be retained as A. anamensis. A. anamensis most closely resembles A. afarensis, but can be distinguished from it in many features. Most of these features are inferred to be primitive for the genus. Based on the limited postcranial evidence available, A. anamensis appears to have been habitually bipedal, although it retained some primitive features of its upper limbs. A. anamensis differs from A. afarensis in having narrower, more parallel jaws with a very slightly more ape-like canine/premolar complex than is found in A. afarensis, although not as ape-like as in Ardipithecus ramidus. It had slightly larger lower lateral incisors, a unique upper canine morphology, and a different structure of the lateral nasal aperture than A. afarensis. A. anamensis had at least as great a range of body size, and perhaps slightly greater canine dimorphism, although this is difficult to determine. At present, there appears to be no autapomorphies precluding A. anamensis from ancestry of A. afarensis. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 368
页数:114
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DE GRU LOG APPLICAT
[3]  
BAKER EW, 1998, AM J PHYS ANTHR S, V26, P66
[4]   VARIATIONS IN ENAMEL THICKNESS AND STRUCTURE IN EAST-AFRICAN HOMINIDS [J].
BEYNON, AD ;
WOOD, BA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1986, 70 (02) :177-193
[5]   PATTERNS AND RATES OF ENAMEL GROWTH IN THE MOLAR TEETH OF EARLY HOMINIDS [J].
BEYNON, AD ;
WOOD, BA .
NATURE, 1987, 326 (6112) :493-496
[6]  
Broom R., 1946, TRANSVAAL MUSEUM MEM, V2
[7]   NEW AUSTRALOPITHECUS-BOISEI CALVARIA FROM EAST LAKE TURKANA, KENYA [J].
BROWN, B ;
WALKER, A ;
WARD, CV ;
LEAKEY, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1993, 91 (02) :137-159
[8]   THE FIRST AUSTRALOPITHECINE 2,500 KILOMETERS WEST OF THE RIFT-VALLEY (CHAD) [J].
BRUNET, M ;
BEAUVILAIN, A ;
COPPENS, Y ;
HEINTZ, E ;
MOUTAYE, AHE ;
PILBEAM, D .
NATURE, 1995, 378 (6554) :273-275
[9]  
Brunet M, 1996, CR ACAD SCI II A, V322, P907
[10]   HOMINID CARPAL, METACARPAL, AND PHALANGEAL BONES RECOVERED FROM THE HADAR FORMATION - 1974-1977 COLLECTIONS [J].
BUSH, ME ;
LOVEJOY, CO ;
JOHANSON, DC ;
COPPENS, Y .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1982, 57 (04) :651-677