Rational choice and progress in the study of ethnic conflict: A review essay

被引:18
作者
Kaufmann, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09636410591002554
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Through an analysis of eight recent books and a number of articles and papers, this article evaluates recent progress in the study of ethnic conflict, including large scale conflicts and episodic riots. Four main approaches have been applied to the study of ethnic conflict: rational choice, constructivism, essentialism, and structuralism (or realism). This evaluation of recent work includes that rational choice has been the least successful of the approaches; its focus on individuals' pursuit of (mainly) material benefits makes it difficult to recognize or to admit the explanatory power of nationalist feelings that do not depend on the prospect of material benefits. Constructivism has been the most influential approach over the past few, decades but until recently, has suffered from methodological weaknesses that have hindered testing. Essentialism has been out favor for as long as constructivism has been in, but recent methodological improvements have produced strong work that has resurrected this approach. Structuralism is the youngest approach; it is still immature but has already yielded important new insights. Some eclectic approaches are emerging that combine strengths of the latter three approaches; it remains to be seen whether comparable eclecticism will combine rational choice with one or more of the others.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 194
页数:28
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
ANDERSON B., 1983, IMAGINED COMMUNITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Perspectives on Politics
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Keeping the Peace: Lasting Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts
[4]  
[Anonymous], ANN M AM POL SCI ASS
[5]  
[Anonymous], LANGUAGE RELIGION PO
[6]  
Ayres R.W., 2000, NATL ETHNIC POLITICS, V6, P91, DOI [rg/10.1080/13537110008428605, https://doi.org/10.1080/13537110008428605, DOI 10.1080/13537110008428605]
[7]  
BATES, POLITICS INTERPRETAT, P250
[8]   The politics of interpretation: Rationality, culture, and transition [J].
Bates, RH ;
de Figueiredo, RJ ;
Weingast, BR .
POLITICS & SOCIETY, 1998, 26 (02) :221-256
[9]   Palestinian suicide bombing: public support, market share, and outbidding [J].
Bloom, MM .
POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2004, 119 (01) :61-88
[10]  
BRASS, LANGUAGE RELIGION PO