Automatic detection of fire smoke using artificial neural networks and threshold approaches applied to AVHRR imagery

被引:84
作者
Li, ZQ [1 ]
Khananian, A
Fraser, RH
Cihlar, J
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Meteorol, ESSIC, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Canada Ctr Remote Sensing, Ottawa, ON K1A OY7, Canada
[3] Intermap Technol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2001年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
AVHRR; classification; fire; neural networks; smoke;
D O I
10.1109/36.951076
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In this study, satellite-based remote sensing techniques were developed for identifying smoke from forest fires. Both artificial neural networks (NN) and multithreshold techniques were explored for application with imagery from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) aboard NOAA satellites. The NN was designed such that it does not only classify a scene into smoke, cloud, or clear background, but also generates continuous outputs representing the mixture portions of these objects. While the NN approach offers many advantages, it is time consuming for application over large areas. A multithreshold algorithm was thus developed as well. The two approaches may be employed separately or in combination depending on the size of an image and smoke conditions. The methods were evaluated in terms of Euclidean distance between the outputs of the NN classification, using error matrices, visual inspection, and comparisons of classified smoke images with fire hot spots. They were applied to process daily AVHRR images acquired across Canada. The results obtained in the 1998 fire season were analyzed and compared with fire hot spots and TOMS-based aerosol index data. Reasonable correspondence was found, but the signals of smoke detected by TOMS and AVHRR are quite different but complementary to each other. In general, AVHRR is most sensitive to low, dense smoke plumes located near fires, whereas smoke detected by TOMS is dispersed, thin, elevated, and further away from fires.
引用
收藏
页码:1859 / 1870
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES VERSUS STATISTICAL-METHODS IN CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISOURCE REMOTE-SENSING DATA [J].
BENEDIKTSSON, JA ;
SWAIN, PH ;
ERSOY, OK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 28 (04) :540-552
[2]  
BLACKADAR AK, 1996, TURBULENCE DIFFUSION, P180
[3]   First estimates of the radiative forcing of aerosols generated from biomass burning using satellite data [J].
Christopher, SA ;
Kliche, DV ;
Chou, J ;
Welch, RM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D16) :21265-21273
[4]   DETECTION OF FOREST-FIRE SMOKE PLUMES BY SATELLITE IMAGERY [J].
CHUNG, YS ;
LE, HV .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 18 (10) :2143-2151
[5]   Land cover classification with AVHRR multichannel composites in northern environments [J].
Cihlar, J ;
Ly, H ;
Xiao, QH .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 58 (01) :36-51
[6]   SPECTRAL IDENTIFICATION BY ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK AND GENETIC ALGORITHM [J].
CLARK, C ;
CANAS, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1995, 16 (12) :2255-2275
[7]   BIOMASS BURNING IN THE TROPICS - IMPACT ON ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES [J].
CRUTZEN, PJ ;
ANDREAE, MO .
SCIENCE, 1990, 250 (4988) :1669-1678
[8]   Hotspot and NDVI differencing synergy (HANDS): A new technique for burned area mapping over boreal forest [J].
Fraser, RH ;
Li, Z ;
Cihlar, J .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 74 (03) :362-376
[9]   Observations of boreal forest fire smoke in the stratosphere by POAM III, SAGE II, and lidar in 1998 [J].
Fromm, M ;
Alfred, J ;
Hoppel, K ;
Hornstein, J ;
Bevilacqua, R ;
Shettle, E ;
Servranckx, R ;
Li, ZQ ;
Stocks, B .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (09) :1407-1410
[10]   Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data [J].
Herman, JR ;
Bhartia, PK ;
Torres, O ;
Hsu, C ;
Seftor, C ;
Celarier, E .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D14) :16911-16922