Postoperative analgesia by continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine after upper abdominal surgery

被引:50
作者
Schug, SA
Scott, DA
Payne, J
Mooney, PH
Hagglof, B
机构
[1] ST VINCENTS HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,MELBOURNE,VIC,AUSTRALIA
[2] ASTRA PAIN CONTROL AB,DEPT MED,SODERTALJE,SWEDEN
关键词
anaesthetics local; ropivacaine; anaesthetic techniques; extradural; analgesia; postoperative; surgery; abdominal;
D O I
10.1093/bja/76.4.487
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Ropivacaine is a new local anaesthetic with advantages that suggest an important role in the provision of postoperative analgesia. The main aim of this study was to investigate the dose-response relationship of extradural infusion of ropivacaine. We studied 36 ASA I-III patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery during general anaesthesia and extradural block (catheter insertion at T6-9) using 0.5% ropivacaine in a randomized, double-blind study. After surgery nine patients each received an extradural infusion of either ropivacaine 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3% or saline at a rate of 10 ml h(-1) for 21 h. All patients had access to i.v, morphine via a PCA device. The ropivacaine groups consumed significantly less morphine over the 21-h infusion period than the saline group (medians: saline 75 mg; 0.1% ropivacaine 32 mg; 0.2% ropivacaine 39 mg; 0.3% ropivacaine 13 mg) (P < 0.05). Pain (VAS scores) at rest was significantly lower in all ropivacaine groups than in the saline group after 4 h of infusion (medians: saline 45 mm; 0.1% ropivacaine 15 mm; 0.2% ropivacaine 12 mm; 0.3% ropivacaine 0 mm). Pain on coughing was significantly less in all ropivacaine groups than in the saline group after 4 h infusion (medians: saline 67 mm; 0.1% ropivacaine 44 mm; 0.2% ropivacaine 33 mm; 0.3% ropivacaine 0 mm) and for 0.2% and 0.3% ropivacaine at later times. Motor block was negligible throughout the infusion. Patient satisfaction was higher in the 0.2% and 0.3% ropivacaine groups than in the two other groups.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 491
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   PAIN ANXIETY AND PERCEIVED CONTROL [J].
BOWERS, KS .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 32 (5P1) :596-&
[2]   ACCIDENTAL SUBDURAL ANALGESIA - CASE REPORT, POSSIBLE CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS AND RELEVANCE TO MASSIVE EXTRADURALS [J].
BOYS, JE ;
NORMAN, PF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1975, 47 (10) :1111-1113
[3]   COMPARISON OF EXTRADURAL ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE [J].
BROCKWAY, MS ;
BANNISTER, J ;
MCCLURE, JH ;
MCKEOWN, D ;
WILDSMITH, JAW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (01) :31-37
[4]   COMPARISON OF 0.5-PERCENT ROPIVACAINE AND 0.5-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE FOR EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER-EXTREMITY SURGERY [J].
BROWN, DL ;
CARPENTER, RL ;
THOMPSON, GE .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (04) :633-636
[5]   EPIDURAL SIEVE AND MBC (MINIMAL BLOCKING CONCENTRATION) - HYPOTHESIS [J].
CRAWFORD, JS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1976, 31 (09) :1277-1280
[6]  
DAHL JB, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P362
[7]   PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH INTRAVENOUS PCA OR EPIDURAL MORPHINE [J].
EGAN, KJ ;
READY, LB .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (01) :6-11
[8]  
FELDMAN HS, 1994, LOCAL ANESTHETIC TOX, P107
[9]   A MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF THE RISK OF PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LAPAROTOMY [J].
HALL, JC ;
TARALA, RA ;
HALL, JL ;
MANDER, J .
CHEST, 1991, 99 (04) :923-927
[10]  
KERKKAMP HEM, 1990, REGION ANESTH, V15, P204