Client perspectives on helpful ingredients of assertive community treatment

被引:42
作者
McGrew, JH [1 ]
Wilson, RG [1 ]
Bond, GR [1 ]
机构
[1] INDIANA UNIV PURDUE UNIV, DOCTORAL PROGRAM CLIN REHABIL PSYCHOL, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/h0101291
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Clients in 6 assertive community treatment (ACT) programs describedfeatures they liked best about ACT Clients responded to an open-ended question embedded in an interview administered by their case managers. Responses were coded into an average of 1.56 categories per client. Clients mentioned non-specific ingredients most frequently (e.g., relationships with case managers); somewhat less frequently they mentioned ingredients considered by experts as integral to the ACT model (e.g., staff availability home visits). Clients mentioning more non-specific ingredients reported greater client satisfaction, Clients mentioning more ACT-specific ingredients recorded a greater reduction in days hospitalized during the first 6 months of treatment. Level of functioning was related to clients' responses. Compared to lower functioning clients, higher functioning clients were more likely to mention the helping relationship as a best feature. Although ACT services differ in many ways from traditional counseling or psychotherapy client-identified best aspects of ACT focused more strongly on features of the helping relationship that have been found to be important for counseling in general.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Evaluation studies review annual
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[3]  
ANTHONY W, 1979, PRINCIPLES PSYCHIAT
[4]  
BAKER F, 1984, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V35, P925
[5]  
BERGIN AE, 1986, HDB PSYCHOTHERAPY BE, P213
[6]  
Beutler L.E., 1986, HDB PSYCHOTHERAPY BE, V3rd, P257
[7]   ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT FOR FREQUENT USERS OF PSYCHIATRIC-HOSPITALS IN A LARGE CITY - A CONTROLLED-STUDY [J].
BOND, GR ;
WITHERIDGE, TF ;
DINCIN, J ;
WASMER, D ;
WEBB, J ;
DEGRAAFKASER, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 18 (06) :865-891
[8]  
BOND GR, 1988, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V39, P411
[9]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[10]  
Cormier W.H., 1991, INTERVIEWING STRATEG