Gibberellins modulate light signaling pathways to prevent Arabidopsis seedling de-etiolation in darkness

被引:145
作者
Alabadi, David [1 ,2 ]
Gallego-Bartolome, Javier [1 ]
Orlando, Leonardo [1 ]
Garcia-Carcel, Laura [1 ]
Rubio, Vicente [3 ]
Martinez, Cristina
Frigerio, Martin [1 ]
Iglesias-Pedraz, Juan Manuel [3 ]
Espinosa, Ana [3 ]
Deng, Xing Wang [4 ]
Blazquez, Miguel A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, CSIC, Inst Biol Mol & Celular Plantas, Av Los Naranjos S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Fdn Comunidad Valenciana Invest Agroalimentaria A, Madrid 28049, Spain
[3] CSIC, Ctr Nacl Biotecnol, Dept Genet Mol Plantas, Canto Blanco 28049, Spain
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Mol Cellular & Dev Biol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
gibberellin; light signaling; de-etiolation; cross-talk; Arabidopsis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03346.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In many plants, photomorphogenesis is the default developmental program after seed germination, and provides the key features that allow adaptation to light. This program is actively repressed if germination occurs in the absence of light, through a mechanism dependent on the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity that is encoded in Arabidopsis by COP1 ((CO) under bar NSTITUTIVE (P) under bar HOTOMORPHOGENIC 1), which induces proteolytic degradation of transcription factors necessary for light-regulated development, such as HY5 (LONG (HY) under bar POCOTYL 5) and HYH (LONG (HY) under bar POCOTYL 5 (H) under bar OMOLOG), and stabilization of transcription factors that promote skotomorphogenesis, such as PIF3 ((P) under bar HYTOCHROME (I) under bar NTERACTING (F) under bar ACTOR 3). Seedlings deficient in gibberellin (GA) synthesis or signaling display a de-etiolated phenotype when grown in darkness, equivalent to the phenotype of cop1 mutants, which indicates that the switch between photo- and skotomorphogenesis is also under hormonal control. Here we provide evidence for the existence of crosstalk between GA and the COP1-mediated pathway, and identify HY5 and the PIF family as nodes of a regulatory network. This interaction occurs through distinct molecular mechanisms, based on the observation that GA signaling regulates protein stability of HY5, and the activity of PIF3.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 335
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Ethylene regulates Arabidopsis development via the modulation of DELLA protein growth repressor function [J].
Achard, P ;
Vriezen, WH ;
Van Der Straeten, D ;
Harberd, NP .
PLANT CELL, 2003, 15 (12) :2816-2825
[2]   DELLAs contribute to plant photomorphogenesis [J].
Achard, Patrick ;
Liao, Lili ;
Jiang, Caifu ;
Desnos, Thierry ;
Bartlett, Joanne ;
Fu, Xiangdong ;
Harberd, Nicholas P. .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 143 (03) :1163-1172
[3]   Photoactivated phytochrome induces rapid PIF3 phosphorylation prior to proteasorne-mediated degradation [J].
Al-Sady, Bassem ;
Ni, Weimin ;
Kircher, Stefan ;
Schaefer, Eberhard ;
Quail, Peter H. .
MOLECULAR CELL, 2006, 23 (03) :439-446
[4]   Gibberellins repress photomorphogenesis in darkness [J].
Alabadí, D ;
Gil, J ;
Blázquez, MA ;
García-Martínez, JL .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 134 (03) :1050-1057
[5]  
Anderson SL, 1997, PLANT CELL, V9, P1727, DOI 10.1105/tpc.9.10.1727
[6]   REGULATORY HIERARCHY OF PHOTOMORPHOGENIC LOCI - ALLELE-SPECIFIC AND LIGHT-DEPENDENT INTERACTION BETWEEN THE HY5 AND COP1 LOCI [J].
ANG, LH ;
DENG, XW .
PLANT CELL, 1994, 6 (05) :613-628
[7]   Molecular interaction between COP1 and HY5 defines a regulatory switch for light control of Arabidopsis development [J].
Ang, LH ;
Chattopadhyay, S ;
Wei, N ;
Oyama, T ;
Okada, K ;
Batschauer, A ;
Deng, XW .
MOLECULAR CELL, 1998, 1 (02) :213-222
[8]   LAF1, a MYB transcription activator for phytochrome A signaling [J].
Ballesteros, ML ;
Bolle, C ;
Lois, LM ;
Moore, JM ;
Vielle-Calzada, JP ;
Grossniklaus, U ;
Chua, NH .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 15 (19) :2613-2625
[9]   Constitutive photomorphogenesis 1 and multiple photoreceptors control degradation of phytochrome interacting factor 3, a transcription factor required for light signaling in Arabidopsis [J].
Bauer, D ;
Viczián, A ;
Kircher, S ;
Nobis, T ;
Nitschke, R ;
Kunkel, T ;
Panigrahi, KCS ;
Adám, É ;
Fejes, E ;
Schäfer, E ;
Nagy, F .
PLANT CELL, 2004, 16 (06) :1433-1445
[10]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3