Epilogue -: Early lessons from CAHPS™ demonstrations and evaluations

被引:26
作者
Carman, KL
Short, PF
Farley, DO
Schnaier, JA
Elliott, DB
Gallagher, PM
机构
[1] Res Triangle Inst, Hlth & Social Policy Div, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Rand Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[4] US Dept HHS, Agcy Hlth Care Policy & Res, Ctr Org & Delivery Studies, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Survey Res Ctr, Boston, MA 02125 USA
关键词
process evaluation; implementation; health care assessment; health plan assessment;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199903001-00011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS(TM)) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS(TM) in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS(TM) (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS(TM) on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS(TM). Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. METHODS. A Similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. RESULTS. There are 4 early results from the CAHPS(TM) demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS(TM) survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS(TM) ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS(TM) that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS(TM) require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. CONCLUSION, The first round CAHPS(TM) demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.
引用
收藏
页码:MS97 / MS105
页数:9
相关论文
共 1 条
[1]  
ROSSI P.H., 1989, EVALUATION SYSTEMATI