Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies

被引:492
作者
Jakobsen, Morten [1 ]
Jensen, Rasmus [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Govt, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Municipal Copenhagen, Finance Adm, Finance Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
METHOD VARIANCE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH; NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY; SERVICE MOTIVATION; RESPONSE STYLES; MODELS; ACQUIESCENCE; PERFORMANCE; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The questionnaire survey is one of the most commonly used methods of data collection in public management research. These surveys often provide the information used to measure both the independent and dependent variables in an analysis. However, this introduces the risk of common method bias-a serious methodological challenge that has not received much attention as a distinct topic in public management research. We discuss the challenge of common method bias in relation to public management studies and illustrate the problem using an analysis of intrinsic work motivation and sickness absence. Thereafter, we discuss solutions for reducing common method bias when it is not possible to use different methods.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 30
页数:28
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DISCRESIONARY NATURE
[2]  
[Anonymous], J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, DOI DOI 10.1093/jopart/mus060
[3]  
[Anonymous], KOMMUNALE PATOLOGIER
[4]   RESPONSE EFFECTS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
AYIDIYA, SA ;
MCCLENDON, MJ .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1990, 54 (02) :229-247
[5]   YEA-SAYING, NAY-SAYING, AND GOING TO EXTREMES - BLACK-WHITE DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE STYLES [J].
BACHMAN, JG ;
OMALLEY, PM .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1984, 48 (02) :491-509
[6]   Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation [J].
Baumgartner, H ;
Steenkamp, JBEM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :143-156
[7]   Testing the stability of an acquiescence style factor behind two interrelated substantive variables in a panel design [J].
Billiet, Jaak B. ;
Davidov, Eldad .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2008, 36 (04) :542-562
[8]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[9]  
Brewer G., 2006, Public service performance: perspectives on measurement and management, P35
[10]   MEASUREMENT ERRORS IN THE BEHAVIORAL-SCIENCES - THE CASE OF PERSONALITY ATTITUDE RESEARCH [J].
BUCKLEY, MR ;
COTE, JA ;
COMSTOCK, SM .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1990, 50 (03) :447-474