Adverse events in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) trials: a systematic review and analysis

被引:138
作者
Nalysnyk, L
Fahrbach, K
Reynolds, MW
Zhao, SZ
Ross, S
机构
[1] MetaWorks Inc, MetaWorks CABG Review Grp, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Pharmacia Corp, Peapack, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/heart.89.7.767
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives: To quantify the incidence of major adverse events (AEs) occurring in hospital or within 30 days after surgery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and to identify risk factors for these AEs. Methods: Systematic review and analysis of studies published in English since 1990. Studies of isolated standard CABG reporting postoperative incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure, or death in hospital or within 30 days were eligible for inclusion. Incidence of these events was calculated overall and for selected patient groups defined by all elective CABG versus mixed (some non-elective); mean ejection fraction less than or equal to50% versus >50%; mean age less than or equal to60 versus >60 years; primary CABG versus some reoperations; randomised controlled trials versus cohort studies; and single centre versus multicentre studies. Odds ratios of selected AEs were computed according to group risk factors. Results: 176 studies (205717 patients) met all inclusion criteria. The average incidence of major AEs occurring in-hospital was death (1.7%); non-fatal MI (2.4%); non-fatal stroke (1.3%); gastrointestinal bleeding (1.5%); and renal failure (0.8%). Thirty day mortality was 2.1%. Meta-analyses show that age >70, female sex, low ejection fraction, history of stroke, MI, or heart surgery, and presence of diabetes or hypertension are all associated with increased 30 day mortality after CABG. Conclusion: The incidence of major AEs in patients after CABG varies widely across studies and patient populations, and this heterogeneity must be controlled when using the literature to benchmark safety.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 772
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
[Anonymous], STAT METHODS METAANA
[2]
[Anonymous], COCHRANE LIB
[3]
A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. [J].
Benson, K ;
Hartz, AJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (25) :1878-1886
[4]
Bryk AS, 1994, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[5]
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. [J].
Concato, J ;
Shah, N ;
Horwitz, RI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (25) :1887-1892
[6]
Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions [J].
Cook, DJ ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Haynes, RB .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (05) :376-380
[7]
METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]
Assessment of therapeutic safety in systematic reviews: literature review [J].
Ernst, E ;
Pittler, MH .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7312) :546-546
[9]
POSTOPERATIVE MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA - THERAPEUTIC TRIALS USING INTENSIVE ANALGESIA FOLLOWING SURGERY [J].
MANGANO, DT ;
SILICIANO, D ;
HOLLENBERG, M ;
LEUNG, JM ;
BROWNER, WS ;
GOEHNER, P ;
MERRICK, S ;
VERRIER, E .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (03) :342-353
[10]
Severe morbidity after coronary artery surgery [J].
Pepper, J .
CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 15 (06) :400-405