Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index

被引:669
作者
Cummins, RA
Eckersley, R
Pallant, J
Van Vugt, J
Misajon, R
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Melbourne, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Natl Ctr Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Swinburne Univ, Sch Math Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
national index; population; satisfaction; social indicators; subjective wellbeing;
D O I
10.1023/A:1024704320683
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index has been designed as a new barometer of Australians' satisfaction with their lives, and life in Australia. It is based on, and develops, the theoretical model of subjective wellbeing homeostasis. The Index comprises two sub-scales of Personal and National Wellbeing. Data were collected through a nationally representative sample of 2000 people in April/May 2001. Factor analysis confirmed the integrity of the two sub-scales and, confirming empirical expectation, the average level of life satisfaction was 75.5 percent of the scale maximum score. Group comparisons revealed that all age groups maintained their Personal Index score within the normal range. In addition, people in country areas were more satisfied with their personal lives than city-dwellers, but less satisfied about the national situation, and people who had recently experienced a strong positive event evidenced a rise in wellbeing, whereas those who had experienced a strong negative event evidenced wellbeing in the low-normal range. It is argued that these data generally support homeostatic theory. However, an unusual result was that females were more satisfied with their own lives than males. A tentative argument is advanced that this may represent a constitutional difference. It is concluded that the Australian Unity Wellbeing Index has potential as a valid, reliable and sensitive instrument to monitor national wellbeing.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 190
页数:32
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Andrew F., 1976, SOCIAL INDICATORS WE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, VALUES QUALITY LIFE, DOI DOI 10.1080/00139157.1976.992967
[3]  
[Anonymous], MEASURING PROGR IS L
[4]  
[Anonymous], MEASURING PROGR IS L
[5]  
[Anonymous], SOC REP
[6]  
[Anonymous], MEASURING PROGR IS L
[7]   GROUP IDENTIFICATION AND SELF-ESTEEM OF DEAF ADULTS [J].
BATCHAVA, Y .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1994, 20 (05) :494-502
[8]   The quality of rural and metropolitan life [J].
Best, CJ ;
Cummins, RA ;
Lo, SK .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 52 (02) :69-74
[9]  
Brown R.I., 1997, QUALITY LIFE PEOPLE, V2nd, P116
[10]  
Campbell A., 1976, QUALITY AM LIFE