The neuroscience of mammalian associative learning

被引:497
作者
Fanselow, MS [1 ]
Poulos, AM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Brain Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Neurosci Program, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
Pavlovian conditioning; amygdala; hippocampus; cerebellum; fear; eyeblink;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070213
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Mammalian associative learning is organized into separate anatomically defined functional systems. We illustrate the organization of two of these systems, Pavlovian fear conditioning and Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning, by describing studies using mutant mice, brain stimulation and recording, brain lesions and direct pharmacological manipulations of specific brain regions. The amygdala serves as the neuroanatomical hub of the former, whereas the cerebellum is the hub of the latter. Pathways that carry information about signals for biologically important events arrive at these hubs by circuitry that depends on stimulus modality and complexity. Within the amygdala and cerebellum, neural plasticity occurs because of convergence of these stimuli and the biologically important information they predict. This neural plasticity is the physical basis of associative memory formation, and although the intracellular mechanisms of plasticity within these structures share some similarities, they differ significantly. The last Annual Review of Psychology article to specifically tackle the question of mammalian associative learning (Lavond et al. 1993) persuasively argued that identifiable "essential" circuits encode memories formed during associative learning. The next dozen years saw breathtaking progress not only in detailing those essential circuits but also in identifying the essential processes occurring at the synapses (e.g., Bi & Poo 2001, Martinez & Derrick 1996) and within the neurons (e.g., Malinow & Malenka 2002, Murthy & De Camilli 2003) that make up those circuits. In this chapter, we describe the orientation that the neuroscience of learning has taken and review some of the progress made within that orientation.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 234
页数:28
相关论文
共 180 条
[1]   REDUCED HIPPOCAMPAL LONG-TERM POTENTIATION AND CONTEXT-SPECIFIC DEFICIT IN ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING IN MGLUR1 MUTANT MICE [J].
AIBA, A ;
CHEN, C ;
HERRUP, K ;
ROSENMUND, C ;
STEVENS, CF ;
TONEGAWA, S .
CELL, 1994, 79 (02) :365-375
[2]   Rapid, synaptically driven increases in the intrinsic excitability of cerebellar deep nuclear neurons [J].
Aizenman, CD ;
Linden, DJ .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (02) :109-111
[3]  
ALBUS J S, 1971, Mathematical Biosciences, V10, P25, DOI 10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4
[4]   A nitric oxide synthase inhibitor delays the formation of learning-related neural activity in the cerebellar interpositus nucleus during rabbit eyelid conditioning [J].
Allen, MT ;
Steinmetz, JE .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1996, 53 (01) :147-153
[5]   Different lateral amygdala outputs mediate reactions and actions elicited by a fear-arousing stimulus [J].
Amorapanth, P ;
LeDoux, JE ;
Nader, K .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (01) :74-79
[6]  
Anagnostaras SG, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P1106
[7]   Activity-dependent presynaptic facilitation and Hebbian LTP are both required and interact during classical conditioning in Aplysia [J].
Antonov, I ;
Antonova, I ;
Kandel, ER ;
Hawkins, RD .
NEURON, 2003, 37 (01) :135-147
[8]   Cerebellar cortical AMPA-kainate receptor blockade prevents performance of classically conditioned nictitating membrane responses [J].
Attwell, PJE ;
Rahman, S ;
Ivarsson, M ;
Yeo, CH .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 19 (24)
[9]   Acquisition of eyeblink conditioning is critically dependent on normal function in cerebellar cortical lobule HVI [J].
Attwell, PJE ;
Rahman, S ;
Yeo, CH .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 21 (15) :5715-5722
[10]   Acquisition of fear conditioning in rats requires the synthesis of mRNA in the amygdala [J].
Bailey, DJ ;
Kim, JJ ;
Sun, W ;
Thompson, RF ;
Helmstetter, FJ .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 113 (02) :276-282