A comparison of different methods to calculate the surface free energy of wood using contact angle measurements

被引:266
作者
Gindl, M
Sinn, G
Gindl, W
Reiterer, A
Tschegg, S
机构
[1] Univ Agr Sci, Inst Meteorol & Phys, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Agr Sci, Christian Doppler Lab Fundamentals Wood Machining, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Agr Sci, Inst Wood Sci, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
关键词
contact angle; sessile drop method; spruce wood; surface free energy;
D O I
10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00795-0
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A number of controversies concerning the correctness of the different approaches to determine the wood surface free energy and its components from contact angle measurement arose in the past, and it is not clear which approach one should follow. In this work the advancing contact angles of pure liquids on microtomed spruce surface were used to determine the surface free energy of wood. The most widely applied approaches for the surface energy of wood: the Zisman approach, the equation of state, the harmonic mean equation, the geometric mean equation and the acid-base approach were compared and the usefulness of this approaches referring to wood as material were discussed. It was found that the acid-base approach delivers a maximum of information about chemical composition of the natural polymer wood, which consists mainly of cellulose, lignin and a variety of hemicelluloses. Therefore, the acid-base approach is most suitable to explain the coating properties (adhesion) of wood surfaces. Furthermore, it is possible to improve the accuracy of the determination of the surface free energy of wood by increasing the number of different liquids applied. A computerized method for the calculation of surface energy parameters from all five liquids used to obtain an approximate solution for disperse, acid and base components of surface free energy greatly facilitated this task. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 287
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Spreading of liquids on rough surfaces [J].
Apel-Paz, M ;
Marmur, A .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 1999, 146 (1-3) :273-279
[2]  
BASCOM WD, 1992, MODERN APPROACH WETT, pCH13
[3]  
BERG JC, 1993, WETTABILITY, pCH2
[4]   Interfacial interaction between low-energy surfaces [J].
Chaudhury, MK .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING R-REPORTS, 1996, 16 (03) :97-159
[5]   INTERPRETATION OF CONTACT-ANGLE HYSTERESIS [J].
CHIBOWSKI, E ;
GONZALEZCABALLERO, F .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 7 (11) :1195-1209
[6]  
COLLETT BM, 1972, WOOD SCI TECHNOL, V6, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00351806
[7]  
Dahlquist G., 1974, NUMERICAL METHODS
[8]   Wet adhesion of low-VOC coatings on wood - A quantitative analysis [J].
de Meijer, M ;
Militz, H .
PROGRESS IN ORGANIC COATINGS, 2000, 38 (3-4) :223-240
[9]  
Erbil HY, 1996, POLYMER, V37, P5483, DOI 10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00385-0
[10]  
FOWKES FM, 1987, J ADHES SCI TECHNOL, V1, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1163/156856187X00049, 10.1163/156856187X00049]