Phase II study of second-line gemcitabine in sensitive or refractory small cell lung cancer

被引:51
作者
Hoang, T
Kim, KM
Jaslowski, A
Koch, P
Beatty, P
McGovern, J
Quisumbing, M
Shapiro, G
Witte, R
Schiller, JH
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Clin Sci, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[2] Wisconsin Oncol Network, Madison, WI USA
关键词
small cell lung cancer; sensitive; refractory; gemcitabine;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-5002(03)00273-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly sensitive to chemotherapy. Despite a dramatic initial response, however, most patients relapse. Given the activity of gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and early clinical trials suggesting activity of gemcitabine in chemo-naive SCLC patients, we conducted a phase 11 study to determine the efficacy and toxicities of gemcitabine in SCLC patients who have failed first-tine chemotherapy. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) was given intravenously on days I and 8, every 3 weeks. Eligibility criteria included prior treatment with only one chemotherapy regimen and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Patients with brain metastases were eligible. Results: Between April 1998 and October 2001, 27 patients were enrolled: 15 patients with sensitive (S) disease (recurred > 3 months after first-line chemotherapy) and 12 patients with refractory (R) disease (failed < 3 months after first-tine chemotherapy). Median age was 61 (range 45-74). All patients had received prior platinum-based therapy involving etoposide and either cisplatin or carboplatin. There were one early death and two early withdrawals because of toxicity. No responses were observed. Of 24 patients who received at least two cycles of gemcitabine, only three achieved stable disease after six cycles white 21 progressed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 6 weeks in S group, 5.6 weeks in R group, and 6 weeks overall. After a minimum potential follow-up of almost 1 year for all patients, the median survival was 8.8 months in S group, 4.2 months in R group, and 6.4 months for the whole group. One-year survival rate was 33.3% in S group, 16.7% in R group, and 25.4% for all patients. Myelosuppression was the most commonly observed adverse effect, with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 30%, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 30%. One patient (3.7%) developed neutropenic fever. Respiratory failure and death, possibly related to pulmonary toxicity, was observed in one patient (3.7%). Conclusion: monotherapy gemcitabine as second-line agent has limited activity in previously treated SCLC. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] EFFICACY AND SAFETY PROFILE OF GEMCITABINE IN NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A PHASE-II STUDY
    ABRATT, RP
    BEZWODA, WR
    FALKSON, G
    GOEDHALS, L
    HACKING, D
    RUGG, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (08) : 1535 - 1540
  • [2] Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease
    Ardizzoni, A
    Hansen, H
    Dombernowsky, P
    Gamucci, T
    Kaplan, S
    Postmus, P
    Giaccone, G
    Schaefer, B
    Wanders, J
    Verweij, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) : 2090 - 2096
  • [3] GEMCITABINE IS AN ACTIVE NEW AGENT IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED EXTENSIVE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER (SCLC) - A STUDY OF THE NATIONAL-CANCER-INSTITUTE-OF-CANADA CLINICAL-TRIALS GROUP
    CORMIER, Y
    EISENHAUER, E
    MULDAL, A
    GREGG, R
    AYOUB, J
    GOSS, G
    STEWART, D
    TARASOFF, P
    WONG, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) : 283 - 285
  • [4] DOMINE M, 2001, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V20, pS317
  • [5] Eckardt J, 1996, ANN ONCOL, V7, P107
  • [6] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND VINCRISTINE VERSUS CISPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE VERSUS ALTERNATION OF THESE REGIMENS IN SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
    FUKUOKA, M
    FURUSE, K
    SAIJO, N
    NISHIWAKI, Y
    IKEGAMI, H
    TAMURA, T
    SHIMOYAMA, M
    SUEMASU, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1991, 83 (12) : 855 - 861
  • [7] TREATMENT OF LIMITED SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER WITH ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN ALTERNATING WITH VINCRISTINE, DOXORUBICIN, AND CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS CONCURRENT ETOPOSIDE, VINCRISTINE, DOXORUBICIN, AND CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND CHEST RADIOTHERAPY - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY
    GOODMAN, GE
    CROWLEY, JJ
    BLASKO, JC
    LIVINGSTON, RB
    BECK, TM
    DEMATTIA, MD
    BUKOWSKI, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [8] INTRATUMORAL PHARMACOKINETIC ANALYSIS BY F-19-MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY AND CYTOSTATIC INVIVO ACTIVITY OF GEMCITABINE (DFDC) IN 2 SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER XENOGRAFTS
    KRISTJANSEN, PEG
    QUISTORFF, B
    SPANGTHOMSEN, M
    HANSEN, HH
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1993, 4 (02) : 157 - 160
  • [9] MASTERS G, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, P19
  • [10] Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer
    Noda, W
    Nishiwaki, Y
    Kawahara, M
    Negoro, S
    Sugiura, T
    Yokoyama, A
    Fukuoka, M
    Mori, K
    Watanabe, K
    Tamura, T
    Yamamoto, S
    Saijo, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (02) : 85 - 91