Global climate policy: will cities lead the way?

被引:212
作者
Kousky, C [1 ]
Schneider, SH [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Int Studies, Dept Int Studies, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
climate policy; local government; abatement strategies; free-rider theory; co-benefits of climate policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.clipol.2003.08.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While the Conference of the Parties wrangle at an international scale with climate policy, a quiet set of policies and measures is being implemented at a local scale by municipalities across the globe. This study examines the motivation municipalities have for undertaking policies to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, when the theory of free-riding would predict that local administrations should find it difficult to unilaterally reduce their emissions for the benefit of the global climate. Through interviews with officials and/or staff in 23 municipalities in the United States enacting climate policy, data are gathered that suggest local government abatement policies are primarily a top-down decision based on what officials or staff members believe to be "good business" or rational policy choices. They are primarily driven by the potential for realised or perceived cost savings and co-benefits rather than by public pressure. Economic data from some dozen municipal projects are analyzed, finding, while municipalities lack sophisticated accounting techniques, some justification for the often-disputed claim that at least initial reductions in emissions can be made at cost savings. In the United States, with the lack of national abatement policies, it is municipalities that are leading the way in beginning to implement mitigation strategies, even if only for initial reductions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 372
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CLIMATE CHANGE POLIC
[3]  
[Anonymous], ENVIRONMENTS
[4]  
[Anonymous], EC ENV
[5]  
Benzschawel D., 2002, CLIMATE PROTECTION P
[6]  
BETSILL M, 2000, LOCALIZING GLOBAL CL
[7]  
*BROOKL CONS COMM, 2002, LOC ACT PLAN CLIM CH
[8]   Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies [J].
Brown, MA .
ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (14) :1197-1207
[9]  
*BURL ECL, 1999, CLIM ACT PLAN BURL
[10]  
BURTRAW D, 2000, ANCILLARY BENEFITS C