Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake

被引:289
作者
Bakun, WH
Aagaard, B
Dost, B
Ellsworth, WL
Hardebeck, JL
Harris, RA
Ji, C
Johnston, MJS
Langbein, J
Lienkaemper, JJ
Michael, AJ
Murray, JR
Nadeau, RM
Reasenberg, PA
Reichle, MS
Roeloffs, EA
Shakal, A
Simpson, RW
Waldhauser, F
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[2] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, Seismol Div, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
[3] CALTECH, Div Geol & Planetary Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Seismol Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Calif Geol Survey, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
[6] US Geol Survey, Vancouver, WA 98683 USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY 10964 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature04067
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Obtaining high-quality measurements close to a large earthquake is not easy: one has to be in the right place at the right time with the right instruments. Such a convergence happened, for the first time, when the 28 September 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake occurred on the San Andreas fault in the middle of a dense network of instruments designed to record it. The resulting data reveal aspects of the earthquake process never before seen. Here we show what these data, when combined with data from earlier Parkfield earthquakes, tell us about earthquake physics and earthquake prediction. The 2004 Parkfield earthquake, with its lack of obvious precursors, demonstrates that reliable short-term earthquake prediction still is not achievable. To reduce the societal impact of earthquakes now, we should focus on developing the next generation of models that can provide better predictions of the strength and location of damaging ground shaking.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 974
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   EARTHQUAKES NEAR PARKFIELD, CALIFORNIA - COMPARING THE 1934 AND 1966 SEQUENCES [J].
BAKUN, WH ;
MCEVILLY, TV .
SCIENCE, 1979, 205 (4413) :1375-1377
[2]  
BAKUN WH, 1984, J GEOPHYS RES, V89, P3051, DOI 10.1029/JB089iB05p03051
[3]   THE PARKFIELD, CALIFORNIA, EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION EXPERIMENT [J].
BAKUN, WH ;
LINDH, AG .
SCIENCE, 1985, 229 (4714) :619-624
[4]  
BAKUN WH, 1987, 87192 USGS, P1
[5]   A simple stick-slip and creep-slip model for repeating earthquakes and its implication for microearthquakes at Parkfield [J].
Beeler, NM ;
Lockner, DL ;
Hickman, SH .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 91 (06) :1797-1804
[6]   INTERACTION OF THE SAN-ANDREAS FAULT CREEPING SEGMENT WITH ADJACENT GREAT RUPTURE ZONES AND EARTHQUAKE RECURRENCE AT PARKFIELD [J].
BEN-ZION, Y ;
RICE, JR ;
DMOWSKA, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1993, 98 (B2) :2135-2144
[7]  
Boore D.M., 1997, Seismol. Res. Lett, V68, P128, DOI DOI 10.1785/GSSRL.68.1.128
[8]  
*CA GEOL SURV, 1998, ALQ PRIOL EARTHQ FAU
[9]  
*CISN SHAKEMAP, 1997, EST INSTR INT
[10]   A silent slip event on the deeper Cascadia subduction interface [J].
Dragert, H ;
Wang, KL ;
James, TS .
SCIENCE, 2001, 292 (5521) :1525-1528