Patterns of unit and item nonresponse in the CAHPS® Hospital Survey

被引:122
作者
Elliott, MN
Edwards, C
Angeles, J
Hambarsoomians, K
Hays, RD
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[2] Amer Inst Res, Washington, DC USA
关键词
bias; weighting; missing data; mean-squared error; design effects; satisfaction;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00476.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To examine the predictors of unit and item nonresponse, the magnitude of nonresponse bias, and the need for nonresponse weights in the Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS((R))) Hospital Survey. A common set of 11 administrative variables (41 degrees of freedom) was used to predict unit nonresponse and the rate of item nonresponse in multivariate models. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the impact of nonresponse on CAHPS Hospital Survey ratings and reports. Unit nonresponse was highest for younger patients and patients other than non-Hispanic whites (p <.001); item nonresponse increased steadily with age (p <.001). Fourteen of 20 reports of ratings of care had significant (p <.05) but small negative correlations with nonresponse weights (median -0.06; maximum -0.09). Nonresponse weights do not improve overall precision below sample sizes of 300-1,000, and are unlikely to improve the precision of hospital comparisons. In some contexts, case-mix adjustment eliminates most observed nonresponse bias. Nonresponse weights should not be used for between-hospital comparisons of the CAHPS Hospital Survey, but may make small contributions to overall estimates or demographic comparisons, especially in the absence of case-mix adjustment.
引用
收藏
页码:2096 / 2119
页数:24
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Changing priorities for improvement: The impact of low response rates in patient satisfaction [J].
Barkley, WM ;
Furse, DH .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1996, 22 (06) :427-433
[2]
A high response is not essential to prevent selection bias: Results from the Leiden 85-plus study [J].
Bootsma-van der Wiel, A ;
van Exel, E ;
de Craen, AJM ;
Gussekloo, J ;
Lagaay, AM ;
Knook, DL ;
Westendorp, RGJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (11) :1119-1125
[3]
Burroughs T E, 1999, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, V25, P271
[4]
Cohen G., 2002, J OFF STAT, V18, P13
[5]
COLSHER P. L., 1989, J GERONTOL, V44, P45
[6]
DEVRIES H, 2005, HLTH SERVICES RES
[7]
Fowler FJ, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P190
[8]
Impact of reminders and method of questionnaire distribution on patient response to mail-back satisfaction survey [J].
Gasquet, I ;
Falissard, B ;
Ravaud, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (11) :1174-1180
[9]
GOLDSTEIN L, 2005, HLTH SERVICES RES
[10]
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL OF NONRESPONSE BIAS IN A SURVEY OF MEDICINE USE BY THE ELDERLY [J].
GROTZINGER, KM ;
STUART, BC ;
AHERN, F .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (10) :989-1003