Obstetric outcome of excessively overgrown fetuses (≥5000 g):: a case-control study

被引:16
作者
Anoon, SS
Rizk, DEE
Ezimokhai, M
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Al Ain Hosp, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[2] United Arab Emirates Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
关键词
birthweight; gestational diabetes mellitus; fetal growth; macrosomia; parity; shoulder dystocia;
D O I
10.1515/JPM.2003.041
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aims: To compare the obstetric outcome of excessively and appropriately grown fetuses. Methods: Medical records of mothers who delivered excessively overgrown fetuses, defined as birthweight >= 5000 g, in our hospital between 1996 and 2000 (n = 47, study group), and a control group who delivered fetuses with normal birthweight (n = 47) were reviewed. Results: Incidence of excessively overgrown fetuses was 0.24% and 68% were boys. Mothers in this group were significantly older, overweight and multiparous (p < 0.0001) and had gestational diabetes mellitus (p < 0.0001) and prolonged pregnancies (p = 0.04). A previous big baby was also significant (p < 0.0001) and the commonest risk factor. There were no obvious risk factors in nine (19.1%) cases. More than half (n = 28, 59.5%) of these babies were delivered vaginally without clinical suspicion of excessive fetal size. Duration of second stage of labor and incidence of maternal trauma were similar in both groups. Cesarean delivery (p = 0.0003), postpartum hemorrhage (p = 0.004), birth asphyxia (p = 0.007), shoulder dystocia (p < 0.0001) and fetal trauma (p = 0.03) were significantly more frequent in the study group. Conclusions: Excessively overgrown fetuses are associated with the same risk factors as fetal macrosomia and should be delivered by cesarean if diagnosed antenatally because of increased maternal and perinatal morbidity during vaginal delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 301
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ACOG PRACT B, V22
[2]   Fetal macrosomia:: risk factors and outcome -: A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases &gt;4500g [J].
Bérard, J ;
Dufour, P ;
Vinatier, D ;
Subtil, D ;
Vanderstichèle, S ;
Monnier, JC ;
Puech, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1998, 77 (01) :51-59
[3]   The large fetus [J].
Berkus, MD ;
Conway, D ;
Langer, O .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 42 (04) :766-784
[4]   Limited usefulness of fetal weight in predicting neonatal brachial plexus injury [J].
Bryant, DR ;
Leonardi, MR ;
Landwehr, JB ;
Bottoms, SF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (03) :686-689
[5]   Shoulder dystocia: Risk identification [J].
Dildy, GA ;
Clark, SL .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 43 (02) :265-282
[6]   Maternal complications of fetal macrosomia [J].
Ferber, A .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 43 (02) :335-339
[7]   Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study [J].
Gonen, O ;
Rosen, DJD ;
Dolfin, Z ;
Tepper, R ;
Markov, S ;
Fejgin, MD .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (06) :913-917
[8]   The neonate with macrosomia [J].
Grassi, AE ;
Giuliano, MA .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 43 (02) :340-348
[9]   Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery [J].
Gregory, KD ;
Henry, OA ;
Ramicone, E ;
Chan, LS ;
Platt, LD .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (04) :507-513
[10]   Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: Association with mode of delivery [J].
Kolderup, LB ;
Laros, RK ;
Musci, TJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (01) :37-41