Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation

被引:124
作者
Blumenschein, K
Johannesson, M
Blomquist, GC
Liljas, B
O'Conor, RM
机构
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Kentucky, Coll Pharm, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Dept Econ, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Martin Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[5] Univ Lund, Dept Econ, S-22007 Lund, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1061360
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Use of the contingent valuation method is controversial among economists because it is based on hypothetical rather than real choices. Previous experiments have suggested that the commonly used dichotomous choice contingent valuation method leads to hypothetical bias, i.e., overestimates the real willingness to pay. We carried out an experiment to compare the dichotomous choice contingent valuation method with real purchase decisions for a consumer good. We confirm previous findings that hypothetical yes responses overestimate real purchase decisions, but we cannot reject the null hypothesis that definitely sure yes responses correspond to real purchase decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   MEASURING VALUES OF EXTRA-MARKET GOODS - ARE INDIRECT MEASURES BIASED [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
HEBERLEIN, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 61 (05) :926-930
[2]  
BJORNSTAD D, 1997, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V10, P207, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1026423201797]
[3]   STATISTICAL BIAS FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATIVE HYPOTHETICAL SURVEYS [J].
BLACKBURN, M ;
HARRISON, GW ;
RUTSTROM, EE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (05) :1084-1088
[4]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[5]   Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Brown, TC ;
McCollum, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 33 (02) :151-162
[6]   Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible? [J].
Cummings, RG ;
Elliott, S ;
Harrison, GW ;
James, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1997, 105 (03) :609-621
[7]  
CUMMINGS RG, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P260
[8]   CONTINGENT VALUATION - IS SOME NUMBER BETTER THAN NO NUMBER [J].
DIAMOND, PA ;
HAUSMAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :45-64
[9]  
Greene, 2003, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, P1241
[10]   VALUING THE ENVIRONMENT THROUGH CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
HANEMANN, WM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :19-43