Ballot manipulation and the "menace of Negro domination": Racial threat and felon disenfranchisement in the United States, 1850-2002

被引:179
作者
Behrens, A
Uggen, C
Manza, J
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Sociol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Polymer Res Inst, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/378647
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Criminal offenders in the United States typically forfeit voting rights as a collateral consequence of their felony convictions. This article analyzes the origins and development of these state felon disenfranchisement provisions. Because these laws tend to dilute the voting strength of racial minorities, we build on theories of group threat to test whether racial threat influenced their passage. Many felon voting bans were passed in the late 1860s and 1870s, when implementation of the Fifteenth Amendment and its extension of voting rights to African-Americans were ardently contested. We find that large nonwhite prison populations increase the odds of passing restrictive laws, and, further, that prison and state racial composition may be linked to the adoption of reenfranchisement reforms. These findings are important for understanding restrictions on the civil rights of citizens convicted of crime and, more generally, the role of racial conflict in American political development.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 605
页数:47
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
ALLARD P, 1999, REGAINING VOTE ASSES
[2]  
Allison PD, 1995, Survival analysis using sas: A practical guide, V2nd
[3]  
Allison PD, 2018, Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences
[4]  
[Anonymous], J SO HIST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Race, Labor, and Punishment in the New South
[6]  
*AUSTR EL COMM, 2001, FREQ ASK QUEST VOT
[7]  
BECKETT K, 1997, MAKING CRIME PAY POL
[8]  
Blalock HM., 1967, THEORY MINORITY GROU
[9]  
BLUMER H, 1958, PAC SOCIOL REV, V1, P3
[10]   Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer's theory of group position to a multiracial social context [J].
Bobo, L ;
Hutchings, VL .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 61 (06) :951-972