PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF A PATIENT-REPORTED MEASURE OF PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING IN SPORADIC INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS

被引:12
作者
Williams, Valerie [1 ]
Coles, Theresa [1 ]
Gnanasakthy, Ari [1 ]
Demuro, Carla [1 ]
Yarr, Stuart [1 ]
Williams, Nicole [1 ]
Lowes, Linda [2 ]
Alfano, Lindsay [2 ]
Tseng, Brian [3 ]
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, 200 Pk Off Dr, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
patient-reported outcomes; physical functioning; psychometric evaluation; sporadic inclusion body myositis; validation Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article; RATING-SCALE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1002/mus.25080
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Introduction: To assess self-reported physical functioning in patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM), the sIBM Physical Functioning Assessment (sIFA) was developed. This research establishes the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the sIFA in patients with sIBM. Methods: Data from 3 small, noninterventional, observational studies were analyzed. Several measures of physical function were included to assess validity. Reliability (Cronbach alpha, test-retest intraclass correlations), construct validity (correlations, analyses of variance), and responsiveness (effect size estimates) were evaluated. Results: Cronbach alphas (range = 0.86-0.91) and test-retest reliability (0.91) were highly satisfactory. Correlations with other measures provided evidence of convergent validity. sIBM patients able to walk without assistive devices scored significantly better on the sIFA (means = 36.0-47.05) than those who required power mobility or wheelchairs (means = 54.9-71.5), demonstrating the discriminating ability of the sIFA. Effect size estimates of responsiveness suggested mild functional progression. Conclusions: Psychometric analyses of the sIFA demonstrate satisfactory reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 665
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Inclusion body myositis: old and new concepts [J].
Amato, A. A. ;
Barohn, R. J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 80 (11) :1186-1193
[2]
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for industry: Patient-Reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims
[3]
Epidemiology of inclusion body myositis in the Netherlands:: A nationwide study [J].
Badrising, UA ;
Maat-Schieman, M ;
van Duinen, SG ;
Breedveld, F ;
van Doorn, P ;
van Engelen, B ;
van den Hoogen, F ;
Hoogendijk, J ;
Höweler, C ;
de Jager, A ;
Jennekens, F ;
Koehler, P ;
van der Leeuw, H ;
de Visser, M ;
Verschuuren, JJ ;
Wintzen, AR .
NEUROLOGY, 2000, 55 (09) :1385-1387
[4]
Barghout V, 2015, 20 ANN INT M INT SOC
[5]
Measures of Physical Performance Assessments [J].
Bennell, Kim ;
Dobson, Fiona ;
Hinman, Rana .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2011, 63 :S350-S370
[6]
Brooks BR, 1996, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V53, P141
[7]
Bruce B, 2005, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V23, pS14
[8]
Diagnosis and classification of sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) [J].
Catalan, M. ;
Selva-O'Callaghan, A. ;
Grau, J. M. .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2014, 13 (4-5) :363-366
[9]
The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function [J].
Cedarbaum, JM ;
Stambler, N ;
Malta, E ;
Fuller, C ;
Hilt, D ;
Thurmond, B ;
Nakanishi, A .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 169 (1-2) :13-21
[10]
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]