Effects of alcohol consumption and alcohol susceptibility on cognition: a psychophysiological examination

被引:86
作者
Bartholow, BD
Pearson, M
Sher, KJ
Wieman, LC
Fabiani, M
Gratton, G
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Missouri Alcoholism Res Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol Sci, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Beckman Inst, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[6] Missouri Alcoholism Res Ctr, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
alcohol; response inhibition; ERPs; cognition; alcohol susceptibility;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00108-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study sought to examine acute effects of alcohol on cognitive processing and performance within the context of two prominent theories of alcohol's effects; namely, that alcohol restricts the focus of attention (e.g. Steele and Josephs, 1990. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 196-205) and that alcohol impairs response inhibition (e.g. Fillmore and Vogel-Sprott, 1999. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 49-55; Fillmore and Vogel-Sprott, 2000. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 239-246). Forty-five participants were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo level of alcohol (0.04 g/kg), a moderate dose (0.40 g/kg), or a higher dose (0.80 g/kg). Brain electrical activity (ERPs) and behavioral responses (reaction time and accuracy) were measured while participants performed a modified flanker task, in which a target letter was flanked by response-compatible or response-incompatible letters. Analyses of behavioral data showed that alcohol increased response competition in accuracy but not response times, suggesting that alcohol influences response selection more than attentional processes per se. This finding is in-line with predictions derived from the response inhibition model. ERP latency data provided mixed support for both models. ERP amplitude data showed that the high dose of alcohol primarily influenced a mostly frontal negativity in the ERP, present on both correct and incorrect response trials. Differences in self-reported susceptibility to alcohol were most evident in the amplitude of the P3 component. Findings are discussed in terms of the differential effects of acute dose and susceptibility on information processing. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 190
页数:24
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, PSYCHOL THEORIES DRI
[2]  
[Anonymous], NIMH DIAGNOSTIC INTE
[3]  
Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[4]  
BARTHOLOW BD, 2003, IN PRESS J PERSONALI
[5]  
BUSHMAN BJ, 1997, EFFECTS ALCOHOL HUMA, P227
[6]   EP COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION AND MEASUREMENT BY PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS-ANALYSIS [J].
CHAPMAN, RM ;
MCCRARY, JW .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1995, 27 (03) :288-310
[7]  
Cohen HL, 1997, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES, V21, P1398
[8]   Drinking and sexual experience on first dates among adolescents [J].
Cooper, ML ;
Orcutt, HK .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 106 (02) :191-202
[9]   Alcohol and fear-potentiated startle: The role of competing cognitive demands in the stress-reducing effects of intoxication [J].
Curtin, JJ ;
Lang, AR ;
Patrick, CJ ;
Stritzke, WGK .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 107 (04) :547-557
[10]   Alcohol affects emotion through cognition [J].
Curtin, JJ ;
Patrick, CJ ;
Lang, AR ;
Cacioppo, JT ;
Birbaumer, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (06) :527-531