Responsiveness of quality, of life measurements to change after reconstructive pelvic surgery

被引:49
作者
FitzGerald, MP [1 ]
Kenton, K [1 ]
Shott, S [1 ]
Brubaker, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Urogynecol & Reconstruct Pelv Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
urinary incontinence; quality of life; surgical outcomes;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2001.116364
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) scores are sensitive to changes in clinical status after surgery for genuine stress incontinence (GSI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP). STUDY DESIGN: Patients were included in this study if they had completed the IIQ-7 and UDI-6 scales and had undergone urodynamic testing before and 3 months after surgery for GSI or POP. Kruskal-Wallis tests and logistic regression were used to compare IIQ-7 and UDI-6 scores according to the outcome of surgery. RESULTS: Among 55 patients satisfying inclusion criteria for the study, 34 (62%) underwent Burch colposuspension, and 21 (38%) underwent suburethral sling procedures for GSI; 44 (80%) patients were subjectively continent after surgery. Thirty-four (62%) patients underwent surgical treatment of their POP; 31 (90%) were subjectively cured of their POP symptoms. Mean IIQ-7 and UDI-6 scores were lower in patients who were subjectively continent, and UDI-6 scores were lower in patients who were objectively cured of GSI. CONCLUSION: UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores change after surgery for GSI and POP, with patients who are subjectively continent having lower postoperative scores on both scales.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 24
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Beaulieu Sylvie, 2000, Journal of Urology, V163, P93
[2]  
Black N, 1996, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V15, P630, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1996)15:6<630::AID-NAU4>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-B
[4]   Outcome measures for urinary incontinence [J].
Blaivas, JG .
UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (2A) :11-19
[5]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178
[6]   RESPONSIVENESS AND VALIDITY IN HEALTH-STATUS MEASUREMENT - A CLARIFICATION [J].
GUYATT, GH ;
DEYO, RA ;
CHARLSON, M ;
LEVINE, MN ;
MITCHELL, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (05) :403-408
[7]   MEASURING THE PSYCHOSOCIAL IMPACT OF URINARY-INCONTINENCE - THE YORK INCONTINENCE PERCEPTIONS SCALE (YIPS) [J].
LEE, PS ;
REID, DW ;
SALTMARCHE, A ;
LINTON, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1995, 43 (11) :1275-1278
[8]  
Lemack Gary E., 2000, Journal of Urology, V163, P73
[9]   HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASURES FOR WOMEN WITH URINARY-INCONTINENCE - THE INCONTINENCE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE AND THE UROGENITAL DISTRESS INVENTORY [J].
SHUMAKER, SA ;
WYMAN, JF ;
UEBERSAX, JS ;
MCCLISH, D ;
FANTL, JA .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1994, 3 (05) :291-306
[10]  
TESTA MA, 1994, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V15, P535