The effects of genotype, foraging role, and sucrose responsiveness on the tactile learning performance of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)

被引:153
作者
Scheiner, R
Page, RE
Erber, J
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Okol & Biol, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Entomol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nlme.2000.3996
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We analyzed sucrose responsiveness and associative tactile learning in two genetic strains of honey bees under laboratory conditions. These strains differ in their foraging behavior. Bees of the "high" strain preferentially collect pollen, "Low"-strain bees mainly forage for nectar. Responsiveness to different sucrose concentrations and tactile learning were examined using the proboscis extension reflex. Acquisition, extinction of conditioned responses, and responses to an alternative tactile stimulus were tested. High-strain bees are more responsive to sucrose than low-strain bees. Regardless of genotype, pollen foragers are more responsive to sucrose than nectar foragers. In bees of both strains we find the same relationship between responsiveness to sucrose and acquisition. Bees responding to low sucrose concentrations show more often the conditioned response during acquisition than those responding only to higher sucrose concentrations. Extinction of conditioned responses depends on the response probability during acquisition. Discrimination between the two tactile stimuli is affected by genotype but not by responsiveness to sucrose. High-strain bees discriminate better than low-strain bees. Our experiments thus establish links between division of labor, responsiveness to sucrose, and associative learning in honey bees. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 150
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BRANDES C, 1990, J COMP PHYSIOL A, V166, P545
[2]   TIME-COURSE OF MEMORY FORMATION DIFFERS IN HONEY BEE LINES SELECTED FOR GOOD AND POOR LEARNING [J].
BRANDES, C ;
FRISCH, B ;
MENZEL, R .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1988, 36 :981-985
[3]   Tactile motor learning in the antennal system of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) [J].
Erber, J ;
Pribbenow, B ;
Grandy, K ;
Kierzek, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 181 (04) :355-365
[4]   Tactile learning in the honeybee [J].
Erber, J ;
Kierzek, S ;
Sander, E ;
Grandy, K .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 183 (06) :737-744
[5]   FOOD-INDUCED AROUSAL AND NONASSOCIATIVE LEARNING IN HONEYBEES - DEPENDENCE OF SENSITIZATION ON THE APPLICATION SITE AND DURATION OF FOOD STIMULATION [J].
HAMMER, M ;
BRAUN, G ;
MAUELSHAGEN, J .
BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 62 (03) :210-223
[6]   FLOWER PETAL MICROTEXTURE IS A TACTILE CUE FOR BEES [J].
KEVAN, PG ;
LANE, MA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1985, 82 (14) :4750-4752
[7]   Operant conditioning of antennal movements in the honey bee [J].
Kisch, J ;
Erber, J .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 99 (01) :93-102
[8]  
Kuwabara M., 1957, Journal of the Faculty of Science Hokkaido University Zoology, V13, P458
[9]   Learning and memory in honeybees: From behavior to neural substrates [J].
Menzel, R ;
Muller, U .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 19 :379-404
[10]   The evolution of insect societies [J].
Page, RE .
ENDEAVOUR, 1997, 21 (03) :114-120