18FDG-PET following treatment as valid predictor for disease-free survival in Hodgkin's lymphoma

被引:116
作者
de Wit, M
Bohuslavizki, KH
Buchert, R
Bumann, D
Clausen, M
Hossfeld, DK
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Hematol & Oncol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Nucl Med, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
DFS; FDG-PET; Hodgkin's disease;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008357126404
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The value of (18)FDG-PET to predict the outcome after therapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma was compared to morphologic staging and ESR. Patients and methods: A total of 50 concurrent (18)FDG-PET and CT studies were performed in 37 patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. ESR was evaluated 32 times after treatment was completed. Results: Out of 39 residual masses found by CT 8 relapses could be proven. Out of 11 CT exams with CR 3 relapses occurred. CT turned out to show a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 72%, 21%, 21%, 73%, and 32%, with respect to predict disease-free survival (DFS). (18)FDG-PET was positive in 22 examinations with 10 recurrences in this group. Out of 28 negative (18)FDG-PET 1 relapse developed 3 years later. (18)FDG-PET turned out to show promising sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 91%, 69%, 46%, 96%, 74%, with respect to predict DFS. ESR was elevated in 12 studies of which 5 relapses could be proven, while out of 20 normal ESR-studies 3 relapses occurred. Thus, ESR turned out to show sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 63%, 71%, 42%, 85%, and 75%, with respect to predict DFS. In summary, only (18)FDG-PET was able to predict DFS statistically significant. Conclusion: (18)FDG-PET can be very useful in patients with residual masses after treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 37
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF TENDON IN VITRO - A PRELIMINARY REPORT
    ABRAHAMS, M
    [J]. MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1967, 5 (05): : 433 - +
  • [2] Barrington S F, 1995, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V7, P334, DOI 10.1016/S0936-6555(05)80549-7
  • [3] BECKER WS, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, pS5771
  • [4] Magnetic resonance imaging and Ga-67 scan versus computed tomography in the staging and in the monitoring of mediastinal malignant lymphoma: A prospective pilot study
    Bendini, M
    Zuiani, C
    Bazzocchi, M
    Dalpiaz, G
    Zaja, F
    Englaro, E
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1996, 4 (3-4): : 213 - 224
  • [5] Bleckmann C, 1999, NUKLEARMED, V38, P56
  • [6] Bogart JA, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V82, P754, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980215)82:4<754::AID-CNCR19>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-X
  • [8] NORMAL ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION RATE AND AGE
    BOTTIGER, LE
    SVEDBERG, CA
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1967, 2 (5544) : 85 - &
  • [9] Computed tomography and F-18-FDG-positron emission tomography for staging lymphomas: a comparison
    Bumann, D
    de Wit, M
    Beyer, W
    Beese, M
    Lubeck, M
    Bucheler, E
    Clausen, M
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1998, 168 (05): : 457 - 465
  • [10] CARBONE PP, 1971, CANCER RES, V31, P1860