Lingual nerve damage during lower third molar removal: A comparison of two surgical methods

被引:74
作者
Robinson, PP
Smith, KG
机构
[1] Dept. Oral and Maxillofacial Surg., School of Clinical Dentistry, Sheffield S10 2TA, Claremont Crescent
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4809126
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The high incidence of lingual sensory disturbance following lower third molar removal in the UK may be due to the elevation of a lingual flap and insertion of a Howarth's periosteal elevator, in an attempt to protect the lingual nerve. We have therefore studied the validity of this technique by recording the incidence of temporary and permanent lingual nerve injury during 771 operations randomly allocated carried out with or without lingual flap retraction. Surgery with lingual flap retraction resulted in lingual sensory disturbance in 6.9% and this persisted, requiring lingual nerve repair, in 0.8%. Surgery without lingual-flap retraction resulted in lingual sensory disturbance in 0.8% (P < 0.0001) and-this persisted, requiring lingual nerve repair; in 0.3%. We conclude that avoidance of lingual retraction reduces the incidence of temporary lingual nerve disturbance and does not increase the incidence of permanent damage. This indicates that use of the Howarth's in this way is invalid, and suggests that for the majority of cases, lingual retraction should be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 461
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF MORBIDITY FOLLOWING THE REMOVAL OF LOWER 3RD MOLARS BY THE LINGUAL SPLIT AND SURGICAL BUR METHODS [J].
ABSI, EG ;
SHEPHERD, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 22 (03) :149-153
[2]   LINGUAL NERVE DAMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THE REMOVAL OF LOWER 3RD MOLARS [J].
BLACKBURN, CW ;
BRAMLEY, PA .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1989, 167 (03) :103-107
[3]  
BRUCE RA, 1980, J AM DENT ASSOC, V101, P240
[4]   INCIDENCE OF NERVE DAMAGE FOLLOWING 3RD MOLAR REMOVAL - A WEST OF SCOTLAND ORAL-SURGERY RESEARCH GROUP-STUDY [J].
CARMICHAEL, FA ;
MCGOWAN, DA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1992, 30 (02) :78-82
[5]   SIDE-EFFECTS AND COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH 3RD MOLAR SURGERY [J].
CHIAPASCO, M ;
DECICCO, L ;
MARRONE, G .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1993, 76 (04) :412-420
[6]  
GILLBE GV, 1985, SURG MOUTH JAWS, P354
[7]   COMPLICATIONS AFTER MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLAR SURGERY - A STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF 500 CONSECUTIVE PROCEDURES IN PRIVATE-PRACTICE [J].
GOLDBERG, MH ;
NEMARICH, AN ;
MARCO, WP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 111 (02) :277-279
[8]   A COMPARISON OF BROAD AND NARROW RETRACTORS FOR LINGUAL NERVE PROTECTION DURING LOWER 3RD MOLAR SURGERY [J].
GREENWOOD, M ;
LANGTON, SG ;
ROOD, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 32 (02) :114-117
[9]  
HASKELL R, 1986, MED LEGAL CONSEQUENC, P51
[10]   MODIFIED DISTOLINGUAL SPLITTING TECHNIQUE FOR REMOVAL OF IMPACTED MANDIBULAR 3RD MOLARS - INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE SEQUELAE [J].
HOCHWALD, DA ;
DAVIS, WH ;
MARTINOFF, J .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1983, 56 (01) :9-11