Improving daily reservoir inflow forecasts with model combination

被引:70
作者
Coulibaly, P [1 ]
Haché, M
Fortin, V
Bobée, B
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Geog & Geol, Dept Civil Engn, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
[2] INRS, ETE, St Foy, PQ G1V 4C7, Canada
[3] Inst Rech Hydro Quebec, IREQ, Varennes, PQ J3X 1S1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:2(91)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A major issue in real-time management of water resources is the need for accurate and reliable hydrologic forecasts at least 24 or 48 h ahead. An experiment on improving the accuracy of a conceptual hydrologic model used for daily reservoir inflow forecasting, by resorting to model combination, is presented. A robust weighted-average method is used to take advantage of three dynamically different models: a nearest-neighbor model, a conceptual model, and an artificial neural network model. At each time step, the output of each of these three models is computed, and either the absolute best result is considered or the competitive results are combined using the improved weighted-average method. The latter approach has shown a significant forecast improvement for up to 4-day-ahead prediction. Moreover, it is found that with the model combination, there is no need for postcorrection of the conceptual model forecasts. It is also found that the prediction accuracy is mainly driven by the nearest-neighbor method for the 2-day-ahead forecasts, and relatively by each model afterwards. However, none of the three models appears significantly better than the combined model approach, whatever the prediction lead time.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 99
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Multi-model data fusion for river flow forecasting: an evaluation of six alternative methods based on two contrasting catchments [J].
Abrahart, RJ ;
See, L .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (04) :655-670
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, 38 WMO
[3]   COMBINATION OF FORECASTS [J].
BATES, JM ;
GRANGER, CWJ .
OPERATIONAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1969, 20 (04) :451-&
[4]   Hydrological forecasting with artificial neural networks:: The state of the art [J].
Coulibaly, P ;
Anctil, F ;
Bobée, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1999, 26 (03) :293-304
[5]   Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach [J].
Coulibaly, P ;
Anctil, F ;
Bobée, B .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 230 (3-4) :244-257
[6]   SOME STATISTICAL RESULTS IN COMBINATION OF FORECASTS [J].
DICKINSON, JP .
OPERATIONAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1973, 24 (02) :253-260
[7]  
Fisher D., 1988, P 5 INT C MACH LEARN, P22
[8]  
FORTIN V, 1999, MODELE METEO APPORT
[9]   A COMPARISON OF PARAMETRIC AND NON-PARAMETRIC METHODS FOR RUNOFF FORECASTING [J].
GALEATI, G .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1990, 35 (01) :79-94
[10]   TRAINING FEEDFORWARD NETWORKS WITH THE MARQUARDT ALGORITHM [J].
HAGAN, MT ;
MENHAJ, MB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 5 (06) :989-993