Directed evolution of Rubisco in Escherichia coli reveals a specificity-determining hydrogen bond in the form II enzyme

被引:56
作者
Mueller-Cajar, Oliver
Morell, Matthew
Whitney, Spencer M.
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Biol Sci, Mol Plant Physiol, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] CSIRO Plant Ind, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1021/bi700820a
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) occupies a critical position in photosynthetic CO2-fixation and consequently has been the focus of intense study. Crystal-structure-guided site-directed mutagenesis studies have met with limited success in engineering kinetic improvements to Rubisco, highlighting our inadequate understanding of structural constraints at the atomic level that dictate the enzyme's catalytic chemistry. Bioselection provides an alternative random mutagenic approach that is useful for identifying and elucidating imperceptible structure-function relationships. Using the dimeric Form II Rubisco from Rhodospirillum rubrum, its gene (rbcM) was randomly mutated and introduced under positive selection into Escherichia coli cells metabolically engineered to be dependent on Rubisco to detoxify its substrate ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate. Thirteen colonies displaying improved fitness were isolated, and all were found to harbor mutations in rbcM at one of two codons, histidine-44 or aspartate-117, that are structurally adjacent amino acids located about 10 angstrom from the active site. Biochemical characterization of the mutant enzymes showed the mutations reduced their CO2/O-2 specificity by 40% and decreased their carboxylation turnover rate by 20-40%. Structural analyses showed histidine-44 and aspartate-117 form a hydrogen bond in R. rubrum Rubisco and that the residues are conserved among other Form II Rubiscos. This study demonstrated the utility-of directed evolution in E. coli for identifying catalytically relevant residues (in particular nonobvious residues disconnected from active site residues) and their potential molecular interactions that influence Rubisco's catalytic chemistry.
引用
收藏
页码:14067 / 14074
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Structural framework for catalysis and regulation in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase [J].
Andersson, I ;
Taylor, TC .
ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2003, 414 (02) :130-140
[2]   Large structures at high resolution: The 1.6 angstrom crystal structure of spinach ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase complexed with 2-carboxyarabinitol bisphosphate [J].
Andersson, I .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 259 (01) :160-174
[3]  
Andrews T.J., 1987, BIOCH PLANTS, P131, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-675410-0.50009-9
[4]  
ANDREWS TJ, 1991, J BIOL CHEM, V266, P9447
[5]   Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants:: the Keio collection [J].
Baba, Tomoya ;
Ara, Takeshi ;
Hasegawa, Miki ;
Takai, Yuki ;
Okumura, Yoshiko ;
Baba, Miki ;
Datsenko, Kirill A. ;
Tomita, Masaru ;
Wanner, Barry L. ;
Mori, Hirotada .
MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2006, 2 (1) :2006.0008
[6]   Mechanism of Rubisco: The carbamate as general base [J].
Cleland, WW ;
Andrews, TJ ;
Gutteridge, S ;
Hartman, FC ;
Lorimer, GH .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1998, 98 (02) :549-561
[7]   Artificially evolved Synechococcus PCC6301 Rubisco variants exhibit improvements in folding and catalytic efficiency [J].
Greene, Dina N. ;
Whitney, Spencer M. ;
Matsumura, Ichiro .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 404 :517-524
[8]   TIGHT REGULATION, MODULATION, AND HIGH-LEVEL EXPRESSION BY VECTORS CONTAINING THE ARABINOSE P-BAD PROMOTER [J].
GUZMAN, LM ;
BELIN, D ;
CARSON, MJ ;
BECKWITH, J .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1995, 177 (14) :4121-4130
[9]   STRUCTURE, FUNCTION, REGULATION, AND ASSEMBLY OF D-RIBULOSE-1,5-BISPHOSPHATECARBOXYLASE OXYGENASE [J].
HARTMAN, FC ;
HARPEL, MR .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 63 :197-234
[10]   SYNTHESIS OF SPINACH PHOSPHORIBULOKINASE AND RIBULOSE 1,5-BISPHOSPHATE IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI [J].
HUDSON, GS ;
MORELL, MK ;
ARVIDSSON, YBC ;
ANDREWS, TJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 19 (03) :213-221