The calcium looping cycle for CO2 capture from power generation, cement manufacture and hydrogen production

被引:303
作者
Dean, C. C. [1 ]
Blamey, J. [1 ]
Florin, N. H. [1 ]
Al-Jeboori, M. J. [1 ]
Fennell, P. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Calcium looping; CCS; CO2; capture; Power generation; Cement manufacture; FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTION; CAO-BASED SORBENTS; CARBON CONCEPT ZECA; CARBONATION/CALCINATION CYCLE; LIMESTONE CALCINATION; REVERSIBLE-REACTION; PARTICLE ATTRITION; CARRYING-CAPACITY; STEAM HYDRATION; DECAY BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2010.10.013
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Calcium looping is a CO2 capture scheme using solid CaO-based sorbents to remove CO2 from flue gases, e.g., from a power plant, producing a concentrated stream of CO2 (similar to 95%) suitable for storage. The scheme exploits the reversible gas-solid reaction between CO2 and CaO(s) to form CaCO3(s). Calcium looping has a number of advantages compared to closer-to-market capture schemes, including: the use of circulating fluidised bed reactors-a mature technology at large scale; sorbent derived from cheap, abundant and environmentally benign limestone and dolomite precursors; and the relatively small efficiency penalty that it imposes on the power/industrial process (i.e., estimated at 6-8 percentage points, compared to 9.5-12.5 from amine-based post-combustion capture). A further advantage is the synergy with cement manufacture, which potentially allows for decarbonisation of both cement manufacture and power production. In addition, a number of advanced applications offer the potential for significant cost reductions in the production of hydrogen from fossil fuels coupled with CO2 capture. The range of applications of calcium looping are discussed here, including the progress made towards demonstrating this technology as a viable post-combustion capture technology using small-pilot scale rigs, and the early progress towards a 2 MW scale demonstrator. (C) 2010 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 855
页数:20
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]   Capturing CO2 from combustion flue gases with a carbonation calcination loop. Experimental results and process development [J].
Abanades, J. C. ;
Alonso, M. ;
Rodriguez, N. ;
Gonzalez, B. ;
Grasa, G. ;
Murillo, R. .
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01) :1147-1154
[2]  
Abanades J. C., 2009, 1 IEA GHG HIGH TEMP
[3]   Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO [J].
Abanades, J. Carlos ;
Grasa, G. ;
Alonso, M. ;
Rodriguez, N. ;
Anthony, E. J. ;
Romeo, L. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (15) :5523-5527
[4]   Conversion limits in the reaction of CO2 with lime [J].
Abanades, JC ;
Alvarez, D .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2003, 17 (02) :308-315
[5]   Fluidized bed combustion systems integrating CO2 capture with CaO [J].
Abanades, JC ;
Anthony, EJ ;
Wang, JS ;
Oakey, JE .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (08) :2861-2866
[6]   Capture of CO2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO [J].
Abanades, JC ;
Anthony, EJ ;
Lu, DY ;
Salvador, C ;
Alvarez, D .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2004, 50 (07) :1614-1622
[7]   The maximum capture efficiency of CO2 using a carbonation/calcination cycle of CaO/CaCO3 [J].
Abanades, JC .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2002, 90 (03) :303-306
[8]   Influence of surface modifiers on the structure of precipitated calcium carbonate [J].
Agnihotri, R ;
Mahuli, SK ;
Chauk, SS ;
Fan, LS .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1999, 38 (06) :2283-2291
[9]   Development of porous solid reactant for thermal-energy storage and temperature upgrade using carbonation/decarbonation reaction [J].
Aihara, M ;
Nagai, T ;
Matsushita, J ;
Negishi, Y ;
Ohya, H .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2001, 69 (03) :225-238
[10]   Carbon dioxide capture from combustion flue gases with a calcium oxide chemical loop. Experimental results and process development [J].
Alonso, M. ;
Rodriguez, N. ;
Gonzalez, B. ;
Grasa, G. ;
Murillo, R. ;
Abanades, J. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2010, 4 (02) :167-173