Evidence for mental models: How do prior knowledge, syntactic complexity, and reading topic affect inference generation in a recall task for nonnative readers of Spanish?

被引:34
作者
Barry, S [1 ]
Lazarte, AA
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Haley Ctr 5040, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/329207
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study tested how domain-related knowledge, syntactic complexity, and reading topic influence inference generation in the written recalls of English-speaking participants after they read Spanish historical texts. Three types of inferences were examined: within-text inferences, elaborative inferences, and incorrect inferences. The total number of inferences generated indicated the richness of the mental model, and the type of inferences generated provided evidence for the nature and accuracy of the model. Two groups of students, a high-knowledge and a low-knowledge group, read three Spanish passages, each on a different topic and at a different level of syntactic complexity as defined by the number of embedded clauses per sentence. Results suggest that high-knowledge readers generate a richer and more accurate mental model than low-knowledge readers. In addition, the level of complexity and the reading topics indicate a complex pattern of influence on the generation of inferences.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 193
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MODELS UNDERSTANDING
[2]  
[Anonymous], MODELS UNDERSTANDING
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, COMPREHENSIVE TEST B
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, HDB READING RES
[5]   EMBEDDED CLAUSE EFFECTS ON RECALL - DOES HIGH PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF CONTENT DOMAIN OVERCOME SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY IN STUDENTS OF SPANISH [J].
BARRY, S ;
LAZARTE, AA .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 1995, 79 (04) :491-504
[6]  
Berman RA, 1984, READ FOREIGN LANG, P139
[7]  
BOVAIR S, 1981, 8 U AR
[8]  
BRITTON BK, 1990, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V25, P53
[9]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[10]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466