Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental assessments of the bigadic geothermal district heating system as a potential green solution

被引:22
作者
Oktay, Z. [1 ]
Dincer, I.
机构
[1] Balikesir Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Balikesir, Turkey
[2] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON, Canada
关键词
geothermal; district heating; energy; environment; economics; exergy; efficiency; parameters;
D O I
10.1080/15435070701583128
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we assess the Bigadic Geothermal District Heating System ( GDHS), which has the world's third longest and Turkey's longest geothermal pipeline, for its energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental factors. The thermal energy capacity of the Bigadic geothermal field is rated as 31.83 MW for a discharge temperature of 45 C. As of the end of 2006, there were two wells actively running ( 429 m and 307 m in depth). The well head temperature is 98 C with a yield of over 100 kg/ s. The actual thermal data taken from the Technical Department of the GDHS are utilized in the analysis to determine the exergy destructions in each component of the system, and the overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the system with a reference temperature of 11 C for December. The energy and exergy flow diagrams are clearly drawn to illustrate how much destructions/ losses take place in addition to the inputs and outputs. The average energy and exergy efficiencies are found to be 40% and 49%, respectively. Exergy content provided by the geothermal fluid is found to be about 11% of its corresponding energy content. Also, we introduce some new parameters - energetic renewability ratio, exergetic renewability ratio, energetic reinjection ratio, and exergetic reinjection ratio - for the geothermal systems, apply them to the Bigadic GDHS, and end up with the following results: 0.46, 0.21, 0.40, and 0.50, respectively. Some economic factors of the GDHS are outlined and discussed. For Bigadic GDHS both quantity and quality values of the other fossil fuels are studied for comparison purposes. The quality factor for geothermal exergy price of the system is investigated for a year, and the average value used in calculations is 0.137. We finally investigate how much reduction in consumption of traditional fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions is possible through the use of the Bigadic GDHS.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 569
页数:21
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Heat exchanger optimization for geothermal district heating systems: A fuel saving approach [J].
Dagdas, Ahmet .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2007, 32 (06) :1020-1032
[2]   A heat kernel lower bound for integral Ricci curvature [J].
Dai, XZ ;
Wei, GF .
MICHIGAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 52 (01) :61-69
[3]   On energetic, exergetic and environmental aspects of drying systems [J].
Dincer, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2002, 26 (08) :717-727
[4]  
Gelegenis J, 2005, APPL ENERG, V80, P401, DOI [10.1016/j.apenergy.2004.04.008, 10.1016/j.apenegy.2004.04.008]
[5]   Evaluation of the chemical exergy of fuels and petroleum fractions [J].
Govin, OV ;
Diky, VV ;
Kabo, GJ ;
Blokhin, AV .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2000, 62 (01) :123-133
[6]  
HEPASLI A, 2007, IN PRESS ENERGY BUIL
[7]   Development of geothermal energy utilization in Turkey: a review [J].
Hepbasli, A ;
Ozgener, L .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2004, 8 (05) :433-460
[8]   Geothermal district heating applications in Turkey: a case study of Izmir-Balcova [J].
Hepbasli, A ;
Canakci, C .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (08) :1285-1301
[9]   Economic evaluation of geothermal power generation, heating, and cooling [J].
Kanoglu, M ;
Çengel, YA .
ENERGY, 1999, 24 (06) :501-509
[10]   Direct application of geothermal energy: 2005 Worldwide review [J].
Lund, JW ;
Freeston, DH ;
Boyd, TL .
GEOTHERMICS, 2005, 34 (06) :691-727