A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding

被引:49
作者
Chu, Adrienne [2 ]
Ahn, Hongshik [2 ]
Halwan, Bhawna [3 ]
Kalmin, Bruce [4 ]
Artifon, Everson L. A. [5 ]
Barkun, Alan [6 ]
Lagoudakis, Michail G. [7 ]
Kumar, Atul [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, US Dept Vet Affairs, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[4] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Gastroenterol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[7] Tech Univ Crete, Intelligent Syst Lab, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Kounoupidiana 73100, Chania Hellas, Greece
关键词
class prediction; cross validation; gastrointestinal bleeding; machine learning;
D O I
10.1016/j.artmed.2007.10.003
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a model to predict the bleeding source and identify the cohort amongst patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) who require urgent intervention, including endoscopy. Patients with acute GIB, an unpredictable event, are most commonly evaluated and managed by non-gastroenterologists. Rapid and consistently reliable risk stratification of patients with acute GIB for urgent endoscopy may potentially improve outcomes amongst such patients by targeting scarce health-care resources to those who need it the most. Design and methods: Using ICD-9 codes for acute GIB, 189 patients with acute GIB and all. available data variables required to develop and test models were identified from a hospital medical records database. Data on 122 patients was utilized for development of the model and on 67 patients utilized to perform comparative analysis of the models. Clinical data such as presenting signs and symptoms, demographic data, presence of co-morbidities, laboratory data and corresponding endoscopic diagnosis and outcomes were collected. Clinical data and endoscopic diagnosis collected for each patient was utilized to retrospectively ascertain optimal management for each patient. Clinical presentations and corresponding treatment was utilized as training examples. Eight mathematical models including artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), shrunken centroid (SC), random forest (RF), logistic regression, and boosting were trained and tested. The performance of these models was compared using standard statistical analysis and ROC curves. Results: Overall the random forest model best predicted the source, need for resuscitation, and disposition with accuracies of approximately 80% or higher (accuracy for endoscopy was greater than 75%). The area under ROC curve for RF was greater than 0.85, indicating excellent performance by the random forest model Conclusion: While most mathematical models are effective as a decision support system for evaluation and management of patients with acute GIB, in our testing, the RF model consistently demonstrated the best performance. Amongst patients presenting with acute GIB, mathematical models may facilitate the identification of the source of GIB, need for intervention and allow optimization of care and healthcare resource allocation; these however require further validation. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 259
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Adler DG, 2004, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V60, P497
[2]   Classification by ensembles from random partitions of high-dimensional data [J].
Ahn, Hongshik ;
Moon, Hojin ;
Fazzari, Melissa J. ;
Lim, Noha ;
Chen, James J. ;
Kodell, Ralph L. .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2007, 51 (12) :6166-6179
[3]   AREA ABOVE ORDINAL DOMINANCE GRAPH AND AREA BELOW RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC GRAPH [J].
BAMBER, D .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 12 (04) :387-415
[4]   Early intensive resuscitation of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding decreases mortality [J].
Baradarian, R ;
Ramdhaney, S ;
Chapalamadugu, R ;
Skoczylas, L ;
Wang, K ;
Rivilis, S ;
Remus, K ;
Mayer, I ;
Iswara, K ;
Tenner, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (04) :619-622
[5]   Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding [J].
Barkun, A ;
Bardou, M ;
Marshall, JK .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 139 (10) :843-857
[6]   A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage [J].
Blatchford, O ;
Murray, WR ;
Blatchford, M .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9238) :1318-1321
[7]   EARLY CLINICAL SIGNS IDENTIFY LOW-RISK PATIENTS WITH ACUTE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE [J].
BORDLEY, DR ;
MUSHLIN, AI ;
DOLAN, JG ;
RICHARDSON, WS ;
BARRY, M ;
POLIO, J ;
GRINER, PF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 253 (22) :3282-3285
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[10]  
CHONG CF, 2003, P AMIA S NOV, P160