Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from a twice daily Prograf-based regimen to a once daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen

被引:121
作者
Alloway, R
Steinberg, S
Khalil, K
Gourishankar, S
Miller, J
Norman, D
Hariharan, S
Pirsch, J
Matas, A
Zaltzman, J
Wisemandle, K
Fitzsimmons, W
First, MR
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Sharp Mem Hosp & Rehabil Ctr, Calif Inst Renal Res, San Diego, CA 90034 USA
[3] Univ Alberta Hosp, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
[4] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Miami, FL 33152 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[6] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Div Organ Transplantat, Madison, WI USA
[8] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[9] St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[10] Fujisawa Healthcare Inc, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.222
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Modified release (MR) tacrolimus is an extended release formulation administered once daily (qD). The purpose of this pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate tacrolimus exposure in stable kidney transplant recipients converted from Prograf twice a day to MR tacrolimus qD. Methods. This was an open-label, multicenter study with a crossover design. Eligible patients were 18 to 65 years of age, more than 6 months posttransplant with stable renal function, and received stable Prograf doses more than 2 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients received Prograf twice a day through day 7; 24-hour PK profiles were obtained on days 1 and 7. Patients were converted to the same milligram-for-milligram daily dose of MR tacrolimus qD in the morning on day 8; 24-hour PK profiles were obtained for MR tacrolimus on days 8, 14, and 21. Laboratory and safety parameters were also evaluated. Results. Most patients (67 of 70) completed all 5 PK profiles. The 90% confidence intervals (0) for the MR tacrolimus vs Prograf comparison at steady state (days 14 and 21. vs days I and 7) were 90.7 and 99.4 for AUC(0-24) and 82.7 and 91.9 for C-min. MR tacrolimus was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of Prograf. AUC(0-24) was highly correlated to C-min, for Prograf (day 1, r = 0.80; day 7, r = 0.84) and MR tacrolimus (day 14, r = 0.92; day 21, r = 0.86). Renal function remained stable after conversion to MR tacrolimus. Conclusion. The steady state PK of MR tacrolimus are equivalent to Prograf after a milligram-for-milligram conversion in stable kidney transplant recipients. The results provide evidence to support a safe 1:1 conversion from Prograf twice a day to MR tacrolimus.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 870
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: A systematic review [J].
Butler, JA ;
Roderick, P ;
Mullee, M ;
Mason, JC ;
Peveler, RC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (05) :769-776
[2]  
DIDLAKE RH, 1988, TRANSPLANT P, V20, P63
[3]   New drugs to improve transplant outcomes [J].
First, MR ;
Fitzsimmons, WE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (09) :S88-S92
[4]  
*GUID IND US DEP H, 2002, BIOAV BIOEQ STUD OR
[5]   A COMPARISON OF THE 2 ONE-SIDED TESTS PROCEDURE AND THE POWER APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE EQUIVALENCE OF AVERAGE BIOAVAILABILITY [J].
SCHUIRMANN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1987, 15 (06) :657-680
[6]  
*US DEP HLTH FDA C, 2003, GUID IND BIOAV BIOEQ