Gait training strategies utilized in poststroke rehabilitation: Are we really making a difference?

被引:66
作者
Bogey, Ross [1 ]
Hornby, T. George
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Rehabil Inst Chicago, Stroke Rehabil Serv, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Phys Therapy, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1310/tsr1406-1
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Stroke is the leading cause of disability in the United States. Restoration of walking continues to be a major goal of rehabilitation for persons with stroke. The concept of a minimal change in performance to be considered important or significant has recently been addressed in the field of stroke rehabilitation. We examine some of the changes in locomotor function in poststroke individuals. None of the neurofacilitation approaches have shown significant improvement in walking performance after stroke. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can be performed by stimulating over the muscle, intra-muscularly, or over the peripheral nerve that innervates a muscle providing insufficient force for gait. To date, no form of artificial stimulation can match natural activation for precision or fatigue resistance. Body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT) is thought to contribute substantially to the reorganization of neural circuitry and has been shown to restore gait of nonambulatory individuals. Despite the promising recovery suggested by BWSTT, the time and physical demands on therapists have prevented it from wide clinical acceptance. Thus various robotic devices have been developed to provide such "mechanical" stepping assistance. The magnitude of changes induced with robotic devices does not appear to be any greater than that achieved with more traditional approaches or as compared to task-specific BWSTT.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   A treadmill and overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: A placebo-controlled randomized trial [J].
Ada, L ;
Dean, CM ;
Hall, JM ;
Bampton, J ;
Crompton, S .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (10) :1486-1491
[2]   Issues in Selecting Outcome Measures to Assess Functional Recovery After Stroke [J].
Barak S. ;
Duncan P.W. .
NeuroRX, 2006, 3 (4) :505-524
[3]  
BARATTA RV, 1992, CRIT REV BIOMED ENG, V19, P419
[4]   Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: A series of case studies [J].
Behmran, AL ;
Harkema, SJ .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2000, 80 (07) :688-700
[5]  
Bobath B, 1977, Physiotherapy, V63, P310
[6]  
BRUNNSTROM S., 1970, MOVEMENT THERAPY HEM
[7]   What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study 5592 [J].
Cella, D ;
Eton, DT ;
Fairclough, DL ;
Bonomi, P ;
Heyes, AE ;
Silberman, C ;
Wolf, MK ;
Johnson, DH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (03) :285-295
[8]   A randomized controlled trial of functional neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke subjects [J].
Daly, JJ ;
Roenigk, K ;
Holcomb, J ;
Rogers, JM ;
Butler, K ;
Gansen, J ;
McCabe, J ;
Fredrickson, E ;
Marsolais, EB ;
Ruff, RL .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (01) :172-178
[9]   Response of sagittal plane gait kinematics to weight-supported treadmill training and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke [J].
Daly, JJ ;
Roenigk, KL ;
Gansen, JL ;
Fredrickson, E ;
Marsolais, EB ;
Rogers, J ;
Ruff, RL .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 41 (6A) :807-820
[10]  
DOBKIN B, 1995, NEUROLOGY, V45, pS6