The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin - The Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group

被引:575
作者
Hesketh, PJ
Grunberg, SM
Gralla, RJ
Warr, DG
Roila, F
De Wit, R
Chawla, SP
Carides, AD
Ianus, J
Elmer, ME
Evans, JK
Beck, K
Reines, S
Horgan, KJ
机构
[1] Caritias St Elizabeths Med Ctr, Brighton, MA 02135 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT USA
[3] New York Lung Canc Alliance, New York, NY USA
[4] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[5] Med Osped Policlin, Monteluce Policlin, Div Oncol, Perugia, Italy
[6] Rotterdam Canc Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Hosp, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[8] Century City Hosp, Los Angeles, CA USA
[9] Merck Res Labs, Blue Bell, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2003.01.095
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: In early clinical trials with patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, the, neurokinin antagonist aprepitant significantly enhanced the efficacy of a standard antiemetic regimen consisting of a type-three 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist and a corticosteroid. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was performed to establish definitively the superiority of the aprepitant regimen versus standard therapy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Patients and Methods: Patients receiving cisplatin ! 70 mg/m(2) for the first time were given either standard therapy (ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; dexamethasone on days 2 to 4) or an aprepitant regimen (aprepitant plus ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on,days 2 to 3; dexamethasone on day 4) Patients recorded nausea and vomiting episodes in a diary. The primary end point was complete response (no emesis and no rescue therapy) on days 1 to 5 postcisplatin, analyzed by a modified intent-to-treat approach. Treatment comparisons were made using logistic regression models. Tolerability was assessed by reported adverse events a id physical and laboratory assessments. Results: The percentage of patients with complete response on days 1 to 5 was significantly higher. in the aprepitant group (72.7% [n = 260] v 52.3% in the standard therapy group [n = 260]), as were the percentages on day 1, and especially on days 2 to 5 (P <.001 for all three comparisons). Conclusion: Compared with standard dual therapy, addition of aprepitant was generally well tolerated and provided consistently superior protection against CINV in patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy. (c) 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:4112 / 4119
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   THE DISTRIBUTION OF SUBSTANCE-P AND 5-HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM OF THE DOG [J].
AMIN, AH ;
CRAWFORD, TBB ;
GADDUM, JH .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1954, 126 (03) :596-618
[2]  
Basurto C, 1995, ANN ONCOL, V6, P805
[3]   Effects of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and granisetron in healthy subjects [J].
Blum, RA ;
Majumdar, A ;
McCrea, J ;
Busillo, J ;
Orlowski, LH ;
Panebianco, D ;
Hesney, M ;
Petty, KJ ;
Goldberg, MR ;
Murphy, MG ;
Gottesdiener, KM ;
Hustad, CM ;
Lates, C ;
Kraft, WK ;
Van Buren, S ;
Waldman, SA ;
Greenberg, HE .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (05) :1407-1419
[4]   Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis by the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist, MK-869, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone [J].
Campos, D ;
Pereira, JR ;
Reinhardt, RR ;
Carracedo, C ;
Poli, S ;
Vogel, C ;
Martinez-Cedillo, J ;
Erazo, A ;
Wittreich, J ;
Eriksson, LO ;
Carides, AD ;
Gertz, BJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1759-1767
[5]  
CHAWLA SP, 2002, CANCER, V94, P3032
[6]   Comparison of L-758,298, a prodrug for the selective neurokinin-1 antagonist, L-754,030, with ondansetron for the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis [J].
Cocquyt, V ;
Van Belie, S ;
Reinhardt, RR ;
Decramer, MLA ;
O'Brien, M ;
Schellens, JHM ;
Borms, M ;
Verbeke, L ;
Van Aelst, F ;
De Smet, M ;
Carides, AD ;
Eldridge, K ;
Gertz, BJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (07) :835-842
[7]   Serotonin mechanisms in chemotherapy-induced emesis in cancer patients [J].
Cubeddu, LX .
ONCOLOGY, 1996, 53 :18-25
[8]   Initial high anti-emetic efficacy of granisetron with dexamethasone is not maintained over repeated cycles [J].
de Wit, R ;
van den Berg, H ;
Burghouts, J ;
Nortier, J ;
Slee, P ;
Rodenburg, C ;
Keizer, J ;
Fonteyn, M ;
Verweij, J ;
Wils, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 (09) :1487-1491
[9]   Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists [J].
deBoerDennert, M ;
deWit, R ;
Schmitz, PIM ;
Djontono, J ;
vanBeurden, V ;
Stoter, G ;
Verweij, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 76 (08) :1055-1061
[10]   Analysis of cumulative probabilities shows that the efficacy of 5HT(3) antagonist prophylaxis is not maintained [J].
deWit, R ;
Schmitz, PIM ;
Verweij, J ;
deBoerDennert, M ;
deMulder, PHM ;
Planting, AST ;
vanderBurg, MEL ;
Stoter, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (02) :644-651