Descriptive and criterion-referenced self-assessment with L2 readers

被引:26
作者
Brantmeier, Cindy [1 ]
Vanderplank, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Romance Languages & Literatures, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Language Ctr, Oxford OX2 6HT, England
关键词
Second language reading; Self-assessment; Criterion-referenced; Advanced language learners;
D O I
10.1016/j.system.2008.03.001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Brantmeier [Brantmeier, C., 2006. Advanced L2 learners and reading placement: self-assessment, computer-based testing, and subsequent performance. System 34 (1), 15-35] found that self-assessment (SA) of second language (L2) reading ability is not an accurate predictor for computer-based testing or subsequent classroom performance. With 359 advanced L2 university-level learners, the present study attempts to provide new empirical evidence concerning the use of SA, when measured via criterion-referenced items, as a predictor of reading scores on a computer-based placement test and subsequent reading achievement. Before reading, participants completed a contextualized, criterion-referenced instrument for SA that was created from the European Language Portfolio. A four-item contextualized SA questionnaire was also completed after reading. Participants completed the following: self-assessment questionnaire taken prior to computer-based test, computer-based test of 8 readings, 2 in-class readings, written recall, multiple-choice, topic familiarity questionnaire, and post-reading SA questionnaire. Findings indicated that a descriptive and criterion-referenced questionnaire for SA may be a reliable predictor of both reading scores on a computer-based test and subsequent classroom performance when comprehension is measured via sentence completion and multiple choice items. The criterion-referenced questionnaire did not prove to be a reliable predictor of reading comprehension with the written recall task for the short story. The post-reading SA instrument proved reliable for all three comprehension tasks. Results hold important implications for both language placement directors and test constructors. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 477
页数:22
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Alderson C., 2000, ASSESSING READING
[2]  
Alderson C., 2005, DIAGNOSING FOREIGN L
[3]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN LANGUAGE PO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SYSTEM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1978, APPROACHES SELF ASSE
[6]   THE CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION OF SOME COMPONENTS OF COMMUNICATIVE PROFICIENCY [J].
BACHMAN, LF ;
PALMER, AS .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1982, 16 (04) :449-463
[7]   THE CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION OF THE FSI ORAL INTERVIEW [J].
BACHMAN, LF ;
PALMER, AS .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 1981, 31 (01) :67-86
[8]  
Bachman Lyle., 2010, LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT
[10]  
Bernhardt E.B., 1983, UNTERRICHTSPRAXIS, V16, P27, DOI DOI 10.2307/3530598