Benefit-risk assessment of rosuvastatin 10 to 40 milligrams

被引:155
作者
Brewer, HB [1 ]
机构
[1] NHLBI, Mol Dis Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00779-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to examine the benefit-risk profile of rosuvastatin at doses of 10 to 40 mg. In dyslipidemic patients, rosuvastatin produced markedly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and equivalent or greater improvements in various lipid measures, including high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. In addition, rosuvastatin is more effective than these statins in allowing patients to reach National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III and Joint European Societies LDL cholesterol goals. The safety profile of rosuvastatin was reviewed (as of April 2003) in 12,569 patients, representing 14,231 patient-years of treatment at doses up to 80 mg. In controlled trials, rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg demonstrated a similar adverse event profile to those for atorvastatin 10 to 80 mg, simvastatin 10 to 80 mg, and pravastatin 10 to 40 mg. Myopathy (defined as muscle symptoms plus serum creatine kinase levels > 10 times the upper limit of normal) attributed to rosuvastatin occurred in less than or equal to 0.03% of patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg. No cases of rhabdomyolysis occurred in patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg. Clinically significant alanine aminotransferase elevations occurred in 0.2% of patients receiving rosuvastatin and those receiving atorvastatin, simvastatin, and provastatin. Compared with other widely used statins, the benefit-risk profile of rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg appears to be very favorable. (C) 2003 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:23K / 29K
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] *ASTR LP, 1998, DAT FIL
  • [2] Risk for myopathy with statin therapy in high-risk patients
    Ballantyne, CM
    Corsini, A
    Davidson, MH
    Holdaas, H
    Jacobson, TA
    Leitersdorf, E
    März, W
    Reckless, JPD
    Stein, EA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (05) : 553 - 564
  • [3] *BAYER, 2000, BAYC
  • [4] A general assessment of the safety of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins).
    Black D.M.
    [J]. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2002, 4 (1) : 34 - 41
  • [5] Efficacy of rosuvastatin compared with other statins at selected starting doses in hypercholesterolemic patients and in special population groups
    Blasetto, JW
    Stein, EA
    Brown, WV
    Chitra, R
    Raza, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (5A) : 3C - 10C
  • [6] *BRIST SQUIBB, 2002, PRAV
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin compared with pravastatin and simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A randomized, double-blind, 52-week trial
    Brown, WV
    Bays, HE
    Hassman, DR
    McKenney, J
    Chitra, R
    Hutchinson, H
    Miller, E
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (06) : 1036 - 1043
  • [8] Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
    Cleeman, JI
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, DR
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19): : 2486 - 2497
  • [9] Collins R, 2002, LANCET, V360, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3
  • [10] The effect of erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin
    Cooper, KJ
    Martin, PD
    Dane, AL
    Warwick, MJ
    Raza, A
    Schneck, DW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 59 (01) : 51 - 56