Cell adhesion and cortex contractility determine cell patterning in the Drosophila retina

被引:154
作者
Kaefer, Jos [1 ]
Hayashi, Takashi [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Maree, Athanasius F. M. [4 ]
Carthew, Richard W. [2 ]
Graner, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble 1, Spectrometrie Phys Lab, Unite Mixte Rech 5588, F-38402 St Martin Dheres, France
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Biochem Mol Biol & Cell Biol, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Biophys & Biochem, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[4] Univ Utrecht, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Michigan State Univ, Dept Zool, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
cell shape; surface mechanics; cellular Potts model;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0704235104
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Because of the resemblance of many epithelial tissues to densely packed soap bubbles, it has been suggested that surface minimization, which drives soap bubble packing, could be governing cell packing as well. We test this by modeling the shape of the cells in a Drosophila retina ommatidium. We use the observed configurations and shapes in wild-type flies, as well as in flies with different numbers of cells per ommatidia, and mutants with cells where E- or N-cadherin is either deleted or misexpressed. We find that surface minimization is insufficient to model the experimentally observed shapes and packing of the cells based on their cadherin expression. We then consider a model in which adhesion leads to a surface increase, balanced by cell cortex contraction. Using the experimentally observed distributions of E- and N-cadherin, we simulate the packing and cell shapes in the wild-type eye. Furthermore, by changing only the corresponding parameters, this model can describe the mutants with different numbers of cells or changes in cadherin expression.
引用
收藏
页码:18549 / 18554
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Pearling in cells: A clue to understanding cell shape [J].
Bar-Ziv, R ;
Tlusty, T ;
Moses, E ;
Safran, SA ;
Bershadsky, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (18) :10140-10145
[2]   The mechanics of heterotypic cell aggregates: Insights from computer simulations [J].
Brodland, GW ;
Chen, HH .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (04) :402-407
[3]   Adhesion proteins and the control of cell shape [J].
Carthew, RW .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 15 (04) :358-363
[4]   A MATHEMATICAL-MODEL OF PATTERN-FORMATION [J].
CHICHILNISKY, EJ .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1986, 123 (01) :81-101
[5]   Hexagonal packing of Drosophila wing epithelial cells by the planar cell polarity pathway [J].
Classen, AK ;
Anderson, KI ;
Marois, E ;
Eaton, S .
DEVELOPMENTAL CELL, 2005, 9 (06) :805-817
[6]   Membrane tether formation from blebbing cells [J].
Dai, JW ;
Sheetz, MP .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 77 (06) :3363-3370
[7]   Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and tissue segregation in relation to malignancy [J].
Foty, RA ;
Steinberg, MS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 48 (5-6) :397-409
[8]   The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation [J].
Foty, RA ;
Steinberg, MS .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 278 (01) :255-263
[9]   Myosin VI is required for E-cadherin-mediated border cell migration [J].
Geisbrecht, ER ;
Montell, DJ .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2002, 4 (08) :616-620
[10]   SIMULATION OF THE DIFFERENTIAL ADHESION DRIVEN REARRANGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CELLS [J].
GLAZIER, JA ;
GRANER, F .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1993, 47 (03) :2128-2154