Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery

被引:248
作者
de Leeuw, JW
Struijk, PC
Vierhout, ME
Wallenburg, HCS
机构
[1] Ikazia Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-3083 AN Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasme Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 2001年 / 108卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00090-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To determine risk factors for the occurrence of third degree perineal tears during vaginal delivery. Design A population-based observational study. Population All 284,783 vaginal deliveries in 1994 and 1995 recorded in the Dutch National Obstetric Database were included in the study. Methods Third degree perineal rupture was defined as any rupture involving the anal sphincter muscles. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors. Main outcome measures An overall rate of third degree perineal ruptures of 1.94% was found. High fetal birthweight, long duration of the second stage of delivery and primiparity were associated with an elevated risk of anal sphincter damage. Mediolateral episiotomy appeared to protect strongly against damage to the anal sphincter complex during delivery (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.20-0.23). All types of assisted vaginal delivery were associated with third degree perineal ruptures, with forceps delivery (OR: 3.33, 95%-CI: 2.97-3.74) carrying the largest risk of all assisted vaginal deliveries. Use of forceps combined with other types of assisted vaginal delivery appeared to increase the risk even further. Conclusions Mediolateral episiotomy protects strongly against the occurrence of third degree perineal ruptures and may thus serve as a primary method of prevention of faecal incontinence. Forceps delivery is a stronger risk factor for third degree perineal tears than vacuum extraction. If the obstetric situation permits use of either instrument, the vacuum extractor should be the instrument of choice with respect to the prevention of faecal incontinence.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 387
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   EPISIOTOMIES AND THE OCCURRENCE OF SEVERE PERINEAL LACERATIONS [J].
ANTHONY, S ;
BUITENDIJK, SE ;
ZONDERVAN, KT ;
VANRIJSSEL, EJC ;
VERKERK, PH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (12) :1064-1067
[2]   INTERVENTION DURING LABOR - RISK-FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLETE TEAR OF THE ANAL-SPHINCTER [J].
BEK, KM ;
LAURBERG, S .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 71 (07) :520-524
[3]  
BELIZAN J, 1993, LANCET, V342, P1517
[4]   UNSUSPECTED SPHINCTER DAMAGE FOLLOWING CHILDBIRTH REVEALED BY ANAL ENDOSONOGRAPHY [J].
BURNETT, SJD ;
SPENCEJONES, C ;
SPEAKMAN, CTM ;
KAMM, MA ;
HUDSON, CN ;
BARTRAM, CI .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (759) :225-227
[5]   RISK-FACTORS FOR 3RD-DEGREE AND 4TH-DEGREE PERINEAL LACERATIONS IN FORCEPS AND VACUUM DELIVERIES [J].
COMBS, CA ;
ROBERTSON, PA ;
LAROS, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (01) :100-104
[6]  
GREEN JR, 1989, OBSTET GYNECOL, V73, P732
[7]   Can women with intrapartum rupture of anal sphincter still suffer after-effects two decades later? [J].
Haadem, K ;
Gudmundsson, S .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 76 (06) :601-603
[8]   EPISIOTOMY AND PERINEAL LESIONS IN SPONTANEOUS VAGINAL DELIVERIES [J].
HENRIKSEN, TB ;
BEK, KM ;
HEDEGAARD, M ;
SECHER, NJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (12) :950-954
[9]   OBSTETRIC DAMAGE AND FECAL INCONTINENCE [J].
KAMM, MA .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) :730-733
[10]   ANAL ENDOSONOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN THE FOLLOW-UP OF PRIMARILY SUTURED SPHINCTERIC RUPTURES [J].
NIELSEN, MB ;
HAUGE, C ;
RASMUSSEN, OO ;
PEDERSEN, JF ;
CHRISTIANSEN, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (02) :104-106