Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer:: A multicenter, prospective study

被引:416
作者
Kauff, Noah D. [1 ]
Domchek, Susan M.
Friebel, Tara M.
Robson, Mark E.
Lee, Johanna
Garber, Judy E.
Isaacs, Claudine
Evans, D. Gareth
Lynch, Henry
Eeles, Rosalind A.
Neuhausen, Susan L.
Daly, Mary B.
Matloff, Ellen
Blum, Joanne L.
Sabbatini, Paul
Barakat, Richard R.
Hudis, Clifford
Norton, Larry
Offit, Kenneth
Rebbeck, Timothy R.
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Clin Genet & Gynecol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9626
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) has been widely adopted as a key component of breast and gynecologic cancer risk-reduction for women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Despite 17% to 39% of all BRCA mutation carriers having a mutation in BRCA2, no prospective study to date has evaluated the efficacy of RRSO for the prevention of breast and BRCA-associated gynecologic (ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal) cancer when BRCA2 mutation carriers are analyzed separately from BRCA1 mutation carriers. Patients and Methods A total of 1,079 women 30 years of age and older with ovaries in situ and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were enrolled onto prospective follow-up studies at one of 11 centers from November 1, 1994 to December 1, 2004. Women self-selected RRSO or observation. Follow-up information through November 30, 2005, was collected by questionnaire and medical record review. The effect of RRSO on time to diagnosis of breast or BRCA-associated gynecologic cancer was analyzed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Results During 3-year follow-up, RRSO was associated with an 85% reduction in BRCA1-associated gynecologic cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.56) and a 72% reduction in BRCA2-associated breast cancer risk (HR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.92). While protection against BRCA1-associated breast cancer (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.22) and BRCA2-associated gynecologic cancer (HR = 0.00; 95% CI, not estimable) was suggested, neither effect reached statistical significance. Conclusion The protection conferred by RRSO against breast and gynecologic cancers may differ between carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Further studies evaluating the efficacy of risk-reduction strategies in BRCA mutation carriers should stratify by the specific gene mutated.
引用
收藏
页码:1331 / 1337
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GYNECOL ONCOL
[2]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[3]   Clinicopathologic features of BRCA-linked and sporadic ovarian cancer [J].
Boyd, J ;
Sonoda, Y ;
Federici, MG ;
Bogomolniy, F ;
Rhei, E ;
Maresco, DL ;
Saigo, PE ;
Almadrones, LA ;
Barakat, RR ;
Brown, CL ;
Chi, DS ;
Curtin, JP ;
Poynor, EA ;
Hoskins, WJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (17) :2260-2265
[4]   Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer .2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 [J].
Burke, W ;
Daly, M ;
Garber, J ;
Botkin, J ;
Kahn, MJE ;
Lynch, P ;
McTierman, A ;
Offit, K ;
Perlman, J ;
Petersen, G ;
Thomson, E ;
Varricchio, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (12) :997-1003
[5]   American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition [J].
Chlebowski, RT ;
Col, N ;
Winer, EP ;
Collyar, DE ;
Cummings, SR ;
Vogel, VG ;
Burstein, HJ ;
Eisen, A ;
Lipkus, I ;
Pfister, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) :3328-3343
[6]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[7]   Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer prevention [J].
Cuzick, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (08) :1636-1643
[8]   Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials [J].
Cuzick, J ;
Powles, T ;
Veronesi, U ;
Forbes, J ;
Edwards, R ;
Ashley, S ;
Boyle, P .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9354) :296-300
[9]   Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers:: a prospective cohort study [J].
Domchek, SM ;
Friebel, TM ;
Neuhausen, SL ;
Wagner, T ;
Evans, G ;
Isaacs, C ;
Garber, JE ;
Daly, M ;
Eeles, R ;
Matloff, E ;
Tomlinson, GE ;
Van't Veer, L ;
Lynch, HT ;
Olopade, O ;
Weber, BL ;
Rebbeck, TR .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (03) :223-229
[10]   Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectorny in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers:: An international case-control study [J].
Eisen, A ;
Lubinski, J ;
Klijn, J ;
Moller, P ;
Lynch, HT ;
Offit, K ;
Weber, B ;
Rebbeck, T ;
Neuhausen, SL ;
Ghadirian, P ;
Foulkes, WD ;
Gershoni-Baruch, R ;
Friedman, E ;
Rennert, G ;
Wagner, T ;
Isaacs, C ;
Kim-Sing, C ;
Ainsworth, P ;
Sun, P ;
Narod, SA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) :7491-7496