Ultrafiltration of protein and humic substances: effect of solution chemistry on fouling and flux decline

被引:108
作者
Jones, KL [1 ]
O'Melia, CR
机构
[1] Howard Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Washington, DC 20059 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
ultrafiltration; membrane fouling; protein adsorption; humic acid adsorption;
D O I
10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00492-6
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The rate and extent of adsorption of a protein and a humic acid onto membranes was measured at varying conditions of pH and ionic strength. The resistance-in-series approach was used to calculate reversible and irreversible fouling resistances, which were then compared for static (no flow) and dynamic runs in order to determine the effect of convective flow and electrostatic interactions on fouling behavior. Although convective forces tended to increase the amount of material accumulated near the membrane surface, electrostatic interactions played a stronger role, as evident in the irreversible adsorption results for the static and dynamic cases. Electrostatic interactions affected reversible and irreversible resistances. Both resistances were higher at the isoelectric point (iep) of the protein and decreased at higher pH values. Humic acid adsorption decreased as pH was increased from 4.7 to 10. Humic acid filtration resulted in a higher resistance per unit mass than protein filtration. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
AIMAR P, 1986, Journal of Membrane Science, V29, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82470-9
[3]   A mass transfer model for the prediction of rejection and flux during ultrafiltration of PEG-6000 [J].
Bhattacharjee, C ;
Datta, S .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 125 (02) :303-310
[4]   A unified model for flux prediction during batch cell ultrafiltration [J].
Bhattacharjee, S ;
Sharma, A ;
Bhattacharya, PK .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 111 (02) :243-258
[5]  
Braghetta A., 1995, THESIS U N CAROLINA
[6]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (11) :2517-2526
[7]   Impact of ultrafiltration operating conditions on membrane irreversible fouling [J].
Crozes, GF ;
Jacangelo, JG ;
Anselme, C ;
Laine, JM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 124 (01) :63-76
[8]  
FANE A, PROGR FILTRATION SEP, V4
[9]   THE EFFECT OF PH AND IONIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEIN SOLUTIONS WITH RETENTIVE MEMBRANES [J].
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD ;
SUKI, A .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1983, 16 (DEC) :195-210
[10]   Membrane fouling during microfiltration of protein mixtures [J].
Guell, C ;
Davis, RH .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 119 (02) :269-284