An analysis of a hybrid optimization method for variational data assimilation

被引:20
作者
Daescu, DN
Navon, IM [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Math, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Inst Math & Its Applicat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Florida State Univ, Sch Computat Sci & Informat Technol, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
optimization; Hessian-free Newton; limited memory L-BFGS; data assimilation;
D O I
10.1080/1061856031000120510
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
In four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4D-Var) an optimal estimate of the initial state of a dynamical system is obtained by solving a large-scale unconstrained minimization problem. The gradient of the cost functional may be efficiently computed using the adjoint modeling, at the expense equivalent to a few forward model integrations; for most practical applications, the evaluation of the Hessian matrix is not feasible due to the large dimension of the discrete state vector. Hybrid methods aim to provide an improved optimization algorithm by dynamically interlacing inexpensive L-BFGS iterations with fast convergent Hessian-free Newton (HFN) iterations. In this paper, a comparative analysis of the performance of a hybrid method vs. L-BFGS and HFN optimization methods is presented in the 4D-Var context. Numerical results presented for a two-dimensional shallow-water model show that the performance of the hybrid method is sensitive to the selection of the method parameters such as the length of the L-BFGS and HFN cycles and the number of inner conjugate gradient iterations during the HFN cycle. Superior performance may be obtained in the hybrid approach with a proper selection of the method parameters. The applicability of the new hybrid method in the framework of operational 4D-Var in terms of computational cost and performance is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 306
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   REPRESENTATIONS OF QUASI-NEWTON MATRICES AND THEIR USE IN LIMITED MEMORY METHODS [J].
BYRD, RH ;
NOCEDAL, J ;
SCHNABEL, RB .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1994, 63 (02) :129-156
[2]   INEXACT NEWTON METHODS [J].
DEMBO, RS ;
EISENSTAT, SC ;
STEIHAUG, T .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 1982, 19 (02) :400-408
[3]   SOME NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS WITH VARIABLE-STORAGE QUASI-NEWTON ALGORITHMS [J].
GILBERT, JC ;
LEMARECHAL, C .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1989, 45 (03) :407-435
[4]  
GRAMMELTVEDT A, 1969, MON WEA REV, V97, P387
[5]  
KALNAY E, 2002, ATMOSPHERIC MODELING, P512
[6]  
Le Dimet FX, 2002, MON WEATHER REV, V130, P629, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<0629:SOIIDA>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
LEHOUCQ RB, 1998, SOFTWARE ENV TOOLS S, V6, P160
[9]   ON THE LIMITED MEMORY BFGS METHOD FOR LARGE-SCALE OPTIMIZATION [J].
LIU, DC ;
NOCEDAL, J .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1989, 45 (03) :503-528
[10]   Automatic preconditioning by limited memory quasi-Newton updating [J].
Morales, JL ;
Nocedal, J .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2000, 10 (04) :1079-1096