Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures

被引：153

作者：

Rounds, J

Tracey, TJ

机构：

[1] University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL

[2] Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL

[3] 210 Education, Univ. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820

来源：

JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY | 1996年 / 43卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1037/0022-0167.43.3.310

中图分类号：

G44 [教育心理学];

学科分类号：

0402 ; 040202 ;

摘要：

A structural meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the fit of J. L. Holland's (1985a) circular order model, I. Gati's (1982) three-group partition, and an alternative three-class partition on vocational interest correlation matrices drawn from the cross-cultural literature. The randomization test of hypothesized order relations (L. Hubert & P. Arabie, 1987) was used to evaluate the model fit for 20 U.S. ethnic matrices, 76 international matrices (representing 18 countries), and a U.S. benchmark sample of 73 matrices. The cross-culture structural equivalence of Holland's circular order model was not supported. Both Gati's partition and the alternative partition fit the U.S. benchmark and international samples equally well. None of the 3 models were found to be an adequate representation of the structure of vocational interests for U.S. ethnic samples.

引用

页码：310 / 329

页数：20

共 126 条

[1]

*AM COLL TEST PROG, 1977, HDB ACT CAR PLANN PR

[2]

*AM COLL TEST PROG, 1988, INT PSYCH HDB 3 ED A

[3]

[Anonymous], APPL CROSS CULTURAL

[4]

[Anonymous], ADV PERSONALITY ASSE